Achieving Legitimacy Through Deliberative Plan-Making Processes—Lessons for Metropolitan Strategic Planning
Achieving Legitimacy Through Deliberative Plan-Making Processes—Lessons for Metropolitan Strategic Planning
复制标题
通过深思熟虑的规划制定过程实现合法性——大都市战略规划的经验教训
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2012
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
C. Legacy
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
C. Legacy
协商民主文献和“扩大思想”理论认为，包容性的利益相关者参与过程允许对规划挑战产生更广泛的视角，从而增加大都市战略规划的合法性。然而，人们经常认为，通过这些过程产生的知识受到计划制定过程的碎片化的限制。本文以大珀斯和大温哥华的参与技术为例，探讨了大都市规划制定过程中过程设计、扩大思维和合法性之间的相互作用。认为职业规划师独特的知识贡献对拓展思维的发展至关重要。
Deliberative democracy literature and the theory of “enlarged thought” posit that inclusive stakeholder engagement processes allow a broader perspective on planning challenges to emerge, increasing the legitimacy of metropolitan strategic plans. However, it is often argued that the knowledge that is generated through such processes is constrained by the fragmentation of the plan-making process. This paper examines the interaction between process design, enlarged thought, and legitimacy in metropolitan plan-making processes, using examples of engagement techniques from Greater Perth and Greater Vancouver. It argues that the unique knowledge contribution of the professional planner is vital to the development of enlarged thought.