Non-Romani Researcher Positionality and Reflexivity
Non-Romani Researcher Positionality and Reflexivity
复制标题
非罗姆人研究员的定位和反身性
作者：
Lucie Fremlová
本文通过批判性地检查-或奇怪(是)-非吉普赛人的研究人员身份和随之而来的特权，来考虑非吉普赛人、盟友认同的研究人员相对于内部/外部研究人员的立场和反身性。在理论层面上，这可以通过例如酷儿的理论概念和批判性白度的概念来促进。批判性白度由于相对于作为社会规范的白度是反/非/反规范的(白中性)而是“酷儿”的。在实践中，采用酷儿、女权主义、女性主义和批判性白化方法意味着，反思性和反身性研究人员进行的研究“与”、“为了”和“关于”吉普赛人不一定是“吉普赛人”，以便参与关于吉普赛人社区的知识生产。尽管如此，这也意味着他们有能力批判性地审视自己的特权，并相应地挑战它，即不仅在学术上，而且在政治和社会上也是如此。
This paper considers the positionality and reflexivity of nonRomani, ally-identified researchers vis-à-vis insider/outsider research by critically examining – or queer(y)ing – non-Romani researcher identity and the privilege that goes with it. On a theoretical level this can be facilitated by, for example, queer theoretical concepts and the concept of critical whiteness. Critical whiteness is “queer” by virtue of being counter/non/anti-normative in relation to whiteness as a social norm (whitenormativity). In practical terms, employing queer, feminist, and critical whiteness methodologies means that reflective and reflexive researchers conducting research “with,” “for,” and “on” Roma do not “have to be” Romani in order to participate inknowledge production on Romani communities. Nonetheless, it implicates their ability to critically examine their own privilege and challenge it accordingly, that is, not only academically but also politically and socially.