Reconciling Conflicting Paradigms of Biodiversity Conservation: Human Intervention and Rewilding
Reconciling Conflicting Paradigms of Biodiversity Conservation: Human Intervention and Rewilding
复制标题
调和生物多样性保护的冲突范式：人类干预和野化
作者：
K. Van Meerbeek;B. Muys;Simon D. Schowanek;Jens‐Christian Svenning
对于我们是否需要干预以保护我们的自然遗产，自然资源保护者中存在着强烈的反对意见。在西欧的传统中，人类干预一直占主导地位，而在其他地方，旨在恢复自我调节生态系统的重新开垦往往是更受欢迎的。然而，文化差异而不是生态差异是这些对立范式的根源，导致了对生物多样性保护并不总是最佳的管理战略。在本文中，我们提出了一个基于生态系统动态和人类足迹(包括土地利用遗产)之间的关系的框架，以指导重新野生和干预措施的混合，以确保生物多样性的未来。我们认为，这些模式不是相互冲突的，而是互补的，并主张在可能的情况下重新野生，在需要的地方进行人工干预。
There are strong opposing views among conservationists about whether we have to intervene to safeguard our natural heritage or not. In the Western European tradition, human intervention has been dominating, whereas, elsewhere, rewilding aimed at restoring self-regulating ecosystems has often been preferred. However, cultural rather than ecological differences are at the root of these opposing paradigms, leading to management strategies that are not always optimal for biodiversity conservation. In the present article, we propose a framework based on the relationship between ecosystem dynamics and the human footprint, including land-use legacies, to guide the mixture of rewilding and intervention practices in order to ensure a biodiverse future. We argue that these paradigms are not conflicting but complementary and advocate for rewilding where possible, human intervention where needed.
影响因子：
5.9
作者：
Feurdean, Angelica;Ruprecht, Eszter;Hickler, Thomas
通讯作者：
Hickler, Thomas
影响因子：
3.7
作者：
Zahawi RA;Duran G;Kormann U
通讯作者：
Kormann U