Type of activity: resistance, aerobic and leisure versus occupational physical activity

Type of activity: resistance, aerobic and leisure versus occupational physical activity
复制标题

DOI:
10.1097/00005768-200106001-00005
复制
发表时间:
2001-06-01
期刊:
MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Howley, ET
Howley, ET
中科院分区:
其他
文献类型:
--
作者:
Howley, ET

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

目的:定义和描述与体力活动和健康中的剂量反应问题相关的基本术语。方法:使用最新的共识文件、立场和报告来提供对体力活动和锻炼进行分类的参考定义和方法。结果:体力活动的两大类是职业性体力活动(OPA)和休闲体力活动(LTPA)。OPA通常指的是8小时的d,而LTPA的持续时间则变化很大。LTPA包括所有形式的有氧活动、结构化耐力锻炼计划、抵抗力训练计划和体育运动。与有氧活动相关的能量消耗可以用绝对值(kJ。Min(-1)),参考身体质量(METS),或与某些最大生理反应(即最大心率(HR)或有氧功率(VO2max))相关。体力活动的净成本应用来表示相对于剂量反应问题的能量消耗。阻力训练的强度是相对于在良好状态下需要举起一次的最大重量(1RM)。OPA的力度遵循了前一次协商一致会议的指导。大多数LTPA的强度可以使用标准的有氧运动分类进行分类;然而,对于长时间(2小时以上)LTPA,OPA的分类可能更合适。结论:根据能量消耗和所需的相对努力,体力活动应以一致和标准化的方式进行分类。
Purpose: To define and describe the essential terminology associated with dose-response issues in physical activity and health. Methods: Recent consensus documents, position stands, and reports were used to provide reference definitions and methods of classifying physical activity and exercise. Results: The two principal categories of physical activity are occupational physical activity (OPA) and leisure-time physical activity (LTPA). OPA is usually referenced to an 8-h d, whereas the duration of LTPA is quite variable. LTPA includes all forms of aerobic activities, structured endurance exercise programs, resistance-training programs, and sports. Energy expenditure associated with aerobic activity can be expressed in absolute terms (kJ . min(-1)), referenced to body mass (METs), or relative to some maximal physiological response (i.e., maximal heart rate (HR) or aerobic power (VO2max)). The net cost of physical activity should be used to express energy expenditure relative to dose-response issues. The intensity of resistance training is presented in terms relative to the greatest weight that call be lifted one time in good form (1RM). The intensity of OPA followed the guidance of a previous consensus conference. The intensity of most LTPA can be categorized using the standard aerobic exercise classifications; however, for long-duration (2+ hours) LTPA, the classifications for OPA may be more appropriate. Conclusion: Physical activities should be classified in a consistent and standardized manner in terms of both energy expenditure and the relative effort required.