Between research and community development:
Between research and community development:
复制标题
在研究和社区发展之间：
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2018
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Ruth Taylor
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Sarah Banks;A. Armstrong;A. Bonner;Yvonne Hall;P. Harman;Luke W. Johnston;C. Levi;Kat Smith;Ruth Taylor
仅供电子书和索引使用]本章讨论联合研究和社区发展之间的关系。特别是，它解决了长期存在的争论，即某些形式的联合研究(特别是参与性行动研究)是否实际上与社区发展没有区别。这一问题的探讨参考了设在英格兰东北部的联合制作的研究项目--想象东北，该项目是关于公民参与(想象--通过研究将社区联系起来)的更大研究方案的一部分。本章对想象力东北的三个要素进行了批判性的分析：一项由学术主导的关于从20世纪70年代到现在的社区发展的研究；从本韦尔和北希尔兹的国家社区发展项目开始；由当地社区组织承担的一系列社区发展项目；以及联合反思和共同调查过程的挑战和结果。它认为联合制作的研究在挑战污名、庆祝地位以及发展技能和社区网络方面的作用--所有这些都可以被认为是社区发展的过程和结果。它还讨论了将一群不同的人聚集在一个共同研究小组中的艰难过程；建立实践者-研究人员身份所需的时间；以及参与一种“协作反身性”所需的技能，小组成员通过这种技能一起批判性地反思小组的角色和动态。
for the e-book only and for indexing] This chapter discusses the relationship between co-produced research and community development. In particular, it addresses longstanding debates about whether certain forms of co-produced research (especially participatory action research), are, in fact, indistinguishable from community development. This question is explored with reference to Imagine North East, a co-produced research project based in North East England, which was part of a larger programme of research on civic participation (Imagine – connecting communities through research). The chapter offers a critical analysis of three elements of Imagine North East: an academic-led study of community development from the 1970s to the present; starting with the national Community Development Projects in Benwell and North Shields; a series of community development projects undertaken by local community-based organisations; and the challenges and outcomes of a joint process of reflection and co-inquiry. It considers the role of co-produced research in challenging stigma, celebrating place and developing skills and community networks – all recognisable as community development processes and outcomes. It also discusses the difficult process of bringing together a disparate group of people in a co-inquiry group; the time taken to develop identities as practitioner-researchers; and the skills required to engage in a kind of ‘collaborative reflexivity’ whereby members of the group critically reflected together on the group’s role and dynamics.
组织变革：北泰恩赛德社区发展项目及其遗产
影响因子：
1.5
作者：
Armstrong A
通讯作者：
Armstrong A