Gathering Evidence for Validity during the Design, Development, and Qualitative Evaluation of Thermochemistry Concept Inventory Items
Gathering Evidence for Validity during the Design, Development, and Qualitative Evaluation of Thermochemistry Concept Inventory Items
复制标题
在热化学概念清单项目的设计、开发和定性评估过程中收集有效性证据
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2013
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Jack Barbera
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
David Wren;Jack Barbera
在过去的十年中，专门为化学课堂开发的评估工具的数量有所增加。在这些工具的设计、开发和评估中，化学教育界采用了更大的评估界使用的许多实践和标准。创建新评估工具的方法现在包括收集广泛的证据，以证明评估工具所得出的数据的使用和解释的有效性。本研究的重点是热化学概念清单 (TCI) 概念清单项目的设计、开发和定性评估。定性研究用于获取 TCI 主要利益相关者的反馈。提供了内容和响应过程有效性的证据，并将其用作反对有效性的两种威胁的论据：构造代表性不足和构造无关方差。此外，确定了我教授的最重要的热化学主题...
Assessment instruments developed specifically for chemistry classrooms have increased in number over the past decade. In the design, development, and evaluation of these instruments, the chemical education community has adopted many of the practices and standards used by the greater assessment communities. Methodologies for creating new assessment instruments now include collecting broad evidence for the validity of the uses and interpretations of data derived from an assessment instrument. The focus of this study is the design, development, and qualitative evaluation of concept inventory items for the Thermochemistry Concept Inventory (TCI). Qualitative research studies were used to obtain feedback from the primary stakeholders of the TCI. Evidence for content and response process validity are provided and used as arguments against the two threats to validity: construct underrepresentation and construct-irrelevant variance. In addition, a determination of the most important thermochemical topics taught i...