Articulating Climate Justice in Copenhagen: Antagonism, the Commons, and Solidarity
Articulating Climate Justice in Copenhagen: Antagonism, the Commons, and Solidarity
复制标题
DOI：
10.1111/j.1467-8330.2012.01025.x
复制
发表时间：
2013-06-01
期刊：
影响因子：
5
通讯作者：
Routledge, Paul
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Chatterton, Paul;Featherstone, David;Routledge, Paul
对气候正义的阐述是2009年12月反对哥本哈根气候谈判的各种动员的核心。本文认为，气候正义的阐述指出了三个共同构成逻辑的出现：对抗，共同（S）和团结。首先，我们认为，气候正义涉及气候政治的对抗性框架，打破了试图将气候变化作为一个后政治问题。其次，我们认为，气候正义涉及形成的前喻政治活动，通过行为的共同表达。第三，我们认为，气候正义政治在不同地点的斗争之间产生了团结，这些团结有可能改变关于气候变化的辩论条件。将这些逻辑纳入对话，可以发展气候正义对政治实践和战略的意义。最后，我们考虑什么是在气候正义和紧张局势的新兴形式的气候政治的不同表达的利害关系。
Articulations of climate justice were central to the diverse mobilisations that opposed the Copenhagen Climate Talks in December 2009. This paper contends that articulations of climate justice pointed to the emergence of three co-constitutive logics: antagonism, the common(s), and solidarity. Firstly, we argue that climate justice involves an antagonistic framing of climate politics that breaks with attempts to construct climate change as a post-political issue. Secondly, we suggest that climate justice involves the formation of pre-figurative political activity, expressed through acts of commoning. Thirdly, we contend that climate justice politics generates solidarities between differently located struggles and these solidarities have the potential to shift the terms of debate on climate change. Bringing these logics into conversation can develop the significance of climate justice for political practice and strategy. We conclude by considering what is at stake in different articulations of climate justice and tensions in emerging forms of climate politics.