Doing the difficult and dangerous: the community program practice scale.
Doing the difficult and dangerous: the community program practice scale.
复制标题
做困难和危险的事情：社区计划实践规模。
DOI：
10.1007/s10488-006-0089-4
复制
发表时间：
2007
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Unick,Jay
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Hargreaves,WilliamA;Jerrell,JeanetteM;Lawless,SuzanneFares;Unick,Jay
CPPS 使用员工受访者来描述非住宅心理健康项目的实践和项目氛围。我们报告了 165 个项目中 1,533 名受访者的心理测量分析。验证性因素和部分信用分析确定了八个实践和五个气候子量表，所有这些子量表都显示出足够的心理测量特性。正如预期的那样，通过实践（R2 值 0.37 至 0.52）比通过气候（R2 值 0.09 至 0.23）更好地区分计划类型。多重判别分析和 K 均值聚类分析说明了 CPPS 区分程序差异的能力。 CPPS 提供了一种有前景、经济的方法来衡量比较服务项目的临床试验中的项目实践。
The CPPS uses staff respondents to portray practices and program climate of nonresidential mental health programs. We report psychometric analyses of 1,533 respondents in 165 programs. Confirmatory factor and partial credit analyses identified eight practice and five climate subscales, all of which show adequate psychometric properties. Program types are distinguished better by practices (R2values .37 to .52) than by climate (R2values .09 to .23), as expected. Multiple discriminant analysis andK-means cluster analysis illustrate how well the CPPS distinguishes program differences. The CPPS offers a promising, economical approach to measuring program practices in clinical trials comparing service programs.