On problems with cosmography in cosmic dark ages

On problems with cosmography in cosmic dark ages
复制标题

论宇宙黑暗时代的宇宙学问题

DOI:
10.1016/j.physletb.2021.136366
复制
发表时间:
2021
期刊:
影响因子:
4.4
通讯作者:
M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari and T. Yang
M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari and T. Yang
中科院分区:
物理与天体物理2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Aritra Banerjee;Eoin Colgain;Misao Sasaki;M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari and T. Yang

文献摘要

相似文献

类星体作为 Ia 型超新星之外的高红移窗口中的标准烛光,显示出相当大的前景。最近,Risaliti、Lusso 和合作者 [1]、[2]、[3] 成功地生成了高红移哈勃图 (z≲ 7),该图支持“类星体哈勃图可以通过标准平面 ΛCDM 模型很好地再现到 z∼ 1.5− 2 的趋势,但在较高红移时会出现强烈偏差”。这个结论取决于光度距离的对数多项式展开。在这篇文章中,我们证明了这种扩展(或其“改进”)通常只能在 z∼ 1.5− 2 范围内可信。因此,扩展有效性的崩溃可能会被误解为与平面 ΛCDM 的(虚拟)偏差。我们通过模拟数据示例进一步说明问题。
Quasars show considerable promise as standard candles in a high-redshift window beyond Type Ia supernovae. Recently, Risaliti, Lusso & collaborators [1],[2],[3] have succeeded in producing a high redshift Hubble diagram (z≲ 7) that supports “a trend whereby the Hubble diagram of quasars is well reproduced by the standard flat ΛCDM model up to z∼ 1.5− 2, but strong deviations emerge at higher redshifts”. This conclusion hinges upon a log polynomial expansion for the luminosity distance. In this note, we demonstrate that this expansion (or “improvements” thereof) typically can only be trusted up to z∼ 1.5− 2. As a result, a breakdown in the validity of the expansion may be misinterpreted as a (phantom) deviation from flat ΛCDM. We further illustrate the problem through mock data examples.