More than one way to say I love you: An Internet-based intervention for training flexible thinking in romantic relationships.
More than one way to say I love you: An Internet-based intervention for training flexible thinking in romantic relationships.
复制标题
表达我爱你的方式不止一种：一种基于互联网的干预措施，用于训练浪漫关系中的灵活思维。
DOI：
10.1002/jclp.23443
复制
发表时间：
2023
影响因子：
3
通讯作者：
Teachman,BethanyA
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Silverman,AlexandraL;Fua,KarlCheng-Heng;Teachman,BethanyA
目的本研究开发并初步测试了认知偏差修正（CBM）的适应性，以针对夫妻关系灵活性的两个方面：产生替代观点的能力，以及在具有挑战性的关系情况下，当伙伴提出替代观点时，非防御性回应的能力（称为合作伙伴视角的灵活性）。方法CBM ‐FlexC培训材料在第1阶段开发，专家用户（N= 4）和终点用户（N= 7）提供了定性反馈。在第2阶段，使用苦恼夫妇的在线样本（N= 18）评估了CBM‐FlexC的可行性和初步疗效。使用多基线设计，参与者完成了三个基线评估，6 CBM-FlexC会议超过2周，和1个月的follow-up. ResultsCBM-FlexC培训导致更大的灵活性，合作伙伴的观点，关系满意度，和一般的心理灵活性相比，基线，并保持改善1个月后的培训时，使用混合效应模型。然而，可靠的变化分析（基于图形检查和可靠的变化指数）表明，大多数参与者没有经历可靠的改善，在合作伙伴的角度来看，或关系satisfaction.ConclusionThis试点研究的灵活性提供了一些积极的信号有关的潜在功效的CBM-FlexC，同时指出需要进一步发展，以加强其效果。
ObjectivesThis study developed and pilot‐tested an adaptation of Cognitive Bias Modification (CBM) to target two aspects of relational flexibility in couples: the ability to generate alternative perspectives, and the ability to respond nondefensively when alternative partner perspectives are raised within challenging relationship situations (referred to as flexibility in partner perspectives).MethodsCBM‐FlexC training materials were developed in Phase 1, and expert users (N= 4) and end‐point users (N= 7) provided qualitative feedback. Feasibility and preliminary efficacy of CBM‐FlexC were evaluated in Phase 2, using an online sample of distressed couples (N= 18). Using a multiple baseline design, participants completed three baseline assessments, six CBM‐FlexC sessions over 2 weeks, and a 1‐month follow‐up.ResultsCBM‐FlexC training resulted in greater flexibility in partner perspectives, relationship satisfaction, and general psychological flexibility compared to baseline, and improvements were maintained 1‐month after training when using mixed‐effects models. However, analyses of reliable change (based on graphical inspection and the Reliable Change Index) indicated that most participants did not experience reliable improvement in flexibility in partner perspectives, or relationship satisfaction.ConclusionThis pilot study provides some positive signals regarding the potential efficacy of CBM‐FlexC, while pointing to the need for further development to strengthen its effects.