Outcome in fracture healing: a review.
Outcome in fracture healing: a review.
复制标题
骨折愈合的结果：回顾。
DOI：
10.1016/s0020-1383(00)00126-1
复制
发表时间：
2001
期刊：
影响因子：
2.5
通讯作者：
James B. Richardson
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Roger Wade;James B. Richardson
这篇社论回顾了骨折愈合的结果测量。单独的放射学和临床方法并不准确，但当骨折愈合时，综合起来可以在临床实践中提供良好的指标。其他定量方法并不实用。骨折愈合的振动分析很复杂，目前仅限于研究。间接断裂刚度测量是可能的，并已用于临床试验。销松动会降低精度。直接骨折刚度的测量已得到验证，使用该方法可以降低再骨折率并缩短独立负重的时间（平均 3 周）。该系统在临床环境中使用准确且简单，并且可以监测骨折的愈合率。使用不良结果测量的研究应谨慎解释。骨折愈合的研究也不例外。
This editorial reviews outcome measures in fracture healing. Individually radiological and clinical methods are inaccurate, but together provide a good indicator in clinical practice when a fracture has healed. Other quantitative methods are not practical. Vibrational analysis of fracture healing is complex and limited to research at present. Indirect fracture stiffness measurement is possible and has been used in clinical trials. Pin loosening reduces accuracy. The measurement of direct fracture stiffness has been validated and using this a decrease in re-fracture rate and a reduction of time to independent weight bearing (on average 3 weeks) was found. The system is accurate and simple to use in the clinical setting and allows the rate of healing to be monitored in fractures. Studies using poor outcome measures should be interpreted with care. The study of healing fractures is no exception.