The fertilization effect of global dimming on crop yields is not attributed to an improved light interception
The fertilization effect of global dimming on crop yields is not attributed to an improved light interception
复制标题
全球变暗对作物产量的施肥效应并非归因于光拦截的改善
DOI:
10.1111/gcb.14822
复制
发表时间:
2019-10
影响因子:
11.6
通讯作者:
Lee Xuhui
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Shao Liping;Li Gang;Zhao Qiannan;Li Yabing;Sun Yutong;Wang Weinan;Cai Chuang;Chen Weiping;Liu Ronghua;Luo Weihong;Yin Xinyou;Lee Xuhui
Global dimming, a decadal decrease in incident global radiation, is often accompanied with an increase in the diffuse radiation fraction, and, therefore, the impact of global dimming on crop production is hard to predict. A popular approach to quantify this impact is the statistical analysis of historical climate and crop data, or use of dynamic crop simulation modelling approach. Here, we show that statistical analysis of historical data did not provide plausible values for the effect of diffuse radiation versus direct radiation on rice or wheat yield. In contrast, our field experimental study of 3 years demonstrated a fertilization effect of increased diffuse radiation fraction, which partly offset yield losses caused by decreased global radiation, in both crops. The fertilization effect was not attributed to any improved canopy light interception but mainly to the increased radiation use efficiency (RUE). The increased RUE was explained not only by the saturating shape of photosynthetic light response curves but also by plant acclimation to dimming that gradually increased leaf nitrogen concentration. Crop harvest index slightly decreased under dimming, thereby discounting the fertilization effect on crop yields. These results challenge existing modelling paradigms, which assume that the fertilization effect on crop yields is mainly attributed to an improved light interception. Further studies on the physiological mechanism of plant acclimation are required to better quantify the global dimming impact on agroecosystem productivity under future climate change.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI:
10.1007/978-94-011-0750-1
发表时间:
1994
期刊:
--
影响因子:
--
作者:
J. Goudriaan;H. H. Laar-H.
通讯作者:
J. Goudriaan;H. H. Laar-H.
影响因子:
5.2
作者:
G. Wohlfahrt;A. Hammerle;Alois Haslwanter;M. Bahn;U. Tappeiner;A. Cernusca
通讯作者:
G. Wohlfahrt;A. Hammerle;Alois Haslwanter;M. Bahn;U. Tappeiner;A. Cernusca
影响因子:
6.9
作者:
A. Wingler;S. Purdy;J. Maclean;Nathalie Pourtau
通讯作者:
A. Wingler;S. Purdy;J. Maclean;Nathalie Pourtau
DOI:
10.2134/1994.physiologyanddetermination.c34
发表时间:
1994
期刊:
--
影响因子:
--
作者:
K. Boote;M. Tollenaar
通讯作者:
K. Boote;M. Tollenaar
影响因子:
11.6
作者:
Wang Xin;Wu Jin;Chen Min;Xu Xiangtao;Wang Zhenhua;Wang Bin;Wang Chengzhang;Piao Shilong;Lin Weili;Miao Guofang;Deng Meifeng;Qiao Chunlian;Wang Jing;Xu Shan;Liu Lingli
通讯作者:
Liu Lingli