Relation of predicted to actual hypnotic responsiveness, with special reference to posthypnotic amnesia.
Relation of predicted to actual hypnotic responsiveness, with special reference to posthypnotic amnesia.
复制标题
预测与实际催眠反应的关系，特别是催眠后遗忘症。
DOI：
10.1080/00207148408416029
复制
发表时间：
1984
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Kihlstrom,JF
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Shor,RE;Pistole,DD;Easton,RD;Kihlstrom,JF
在接受Shor & E的哈佛团体催眠易感性量表A（HGSHS：A）之前。Orne（1962），423名幼稚志愿者被要求预测他们对12种成分HCSHS：A建议的行为反应。另外418名学生没有事先做出预测。HGSHS：A作为一个整体（r = 0.34）和许多单独的项目（尽管所有r <0.22），预测和实际催眠反应之间的关系是显着的。事先获得有关HGSHS：A内容的信息的学生得分显著低于未获得信息的学生。这种差异在12个单独的HGSHS：A项目中的9个项目中是明显的（所有p < . 01），尽管在催眠后遗忘暗示中最明显。虽然学生的期望是催眠反应的重要决定因素，但他们也有相当大的惊讶和失望。催眠反应的能力和态度的贡献之间的区别，并建议健忘症和普通遗忘的结果的影响进行了讨论。
Prior to receiving the Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility, Form A (HGSHS:A) of Shor & E. Orne (1962), 423 naive volunteer Ss were asked to predict their behavioral response to each of the 12 constituent HCSHS: A suggestions. Another 418 Ss made no prior predictions. The relationships between predicted and actual hypnotic responsiveness were significant for HGSHS:A as a whole (r = .34) and for many of the individual items (though all r < .22). Ss who received prior information concerning the contents of HGSHS:A scored significantly lower than those Ss who were uninformed. This difference was apparent for 9 of the 12 individual HGSHS:A items (all p < .Ol), although it was most apparent for the posthypnotic amnesia suggestion. Although Ss' expectations are significant determinants of hypnotic responsiveness, there is also considerable surprise and disappointment on their part. Implications of the results for the distinction between aptitude and attitude contributions to hypnotic responsiveness, and between suggested amnesia and ordinary forgetting, are discussed.