Predicting institutional adjustment and recidivism with the psychopathy checklist factor scores: A meta-analysis
Predicting institutional adjustment and recidivism with the psychopathy checklist factor scores: A meta-analysis
复制标题
DOI：
10.1023/a:1025490207678
复制
发表时间：
2003-10-01
影响因子：
2.5
通讯作者：
Walters, GD
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Walters, GD
本研究探讨了 PCL/PCL-R 因子评分在预测法医委托人和监狱囚犯的制度调整和累犯方面的有效性。在 42 项研究中，使用 PCL/PCL-R 对制度调整、释放结果（累犯）或两者进行前瞻性评估，在 PCL/PCL-R 因子评分和制度调整/累犯测量之间产生了 50 个效应大小估计值。对这些结果的荟萃分析显示，因素 2（反社会/不稳定的生活方式）与制度调整和累犯之间存在中等程度的相关性，而因素 1（情感/人际特征）与这些结果的相关性不太强。对因素 1 和因素 2 获得的平均效应大小的直接比较表明，因素 2 比因素 1 更能预测总体结果、一般累犯、暴力累犯以及 12 项方法论最合理的研究的结果。因素 1 和因素 2 在制度调整措施方面的差异较小。
This study explored the validity of the PCL/PCL-R factor scores in predicting institutional adjustment and recidivism in forensic clients and prison inmates. Forty-two studies in which institutional adjustment, release outcome ( recidivism), or both were assessed prospectively with the PCL/PCL-R yielded 50 effect size estimates between the PCL/PCL-R factor scores and measures of institutional adjustment/recidivism. A meta-analysis of these findings disclosed that Factor 2 ( Antisocial/Unstable Lifestyle) correlated moderately well with institutional adjustment and recidivism, whereas Factor 1 (Affective/Interpersonal Traits) was less robustly associated with these outcomes. Direct comparisons of the mean effect sizes attained by Factors 1 and 2 revealed that Factor 2 was significantly more predictive of total outcomes, general recidivism, violent recidivism, and outcomes from the 12 most methodological sound studies than Factor 1. There was less differentiation between Factors 1 and 2 on measures of institutional adjustment.