Grounded theory: An exploration of process and procedure
Grounded theory: An exploration of process and procedure
复制标题
DOI：
10.1177/1049732305285972
复制
发表时间：
2006-04-01
影响因子：
3.2
通讯作者：
Myrick, F
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Walker, D;Myrick, F
扎根理论，作为所有不断发展的定性研究方法，是其历史的产物，以及其认识论。在文献中，有一些讨论集中在格拉泽（1978，1992）和施特劳斯（1987，1990）的扎根理论版本之间的差异。本文的目的是通过比较格拉泽和施特劳斯所倡导的数据分析过程和程序，具体探讨格拉泽-施特劳斯之争，从而为这一讨论增加一个深度和广度。为了完成这一任务，作者将文章分为两部分。首先，它们提供了扎根理论作为研究方法的相关背景信息。其次，他们追求更深入的讨论格拉泽的立场，使用格拉泽的工作，施特劳斯，使用施特劳斯和施特劳斯和科尔宾（1990）的工作，关于数据分析的不同阶段，特别是解决编码程序，验证，以及强迫与涌现的问题。
Grounded theory, as all evolving qualitative research method, is a product of its history as well as of its epistemology. Within the literature, there have been a number of discussions focusing on the differences between Glaser's (1978, 1992) and Strauss's (1987, 1990) versions of grounded theory. The purpose of this article is to add a level of depth and breadth to this discussion through specifically exploring the Glaser-Strauss debate by comparing the data analysis processes and procedures advocated by Glaser and by Strauss. To accomplish this task, the authors present the article in two sections. First, they provide relevant background information on grounded theory as a research method. Second, they pursue a more in-depth discussion of the positions of Glaser, using Glaser's work, and Strauss, using Strauss's and Strauss and Corbin's (1990) work, regarding the different phases of data analysis, specifically addressing the coding procedures, verification, and the issue of forcing versus emergence.