Comparison of Home and Office Blood Pressure Devices in the Clinical Setting.
Comparison of Home and Office Blood Pressure Devices in the Clinical Setting.
复制标题
家庭和办公室血压设备在临床环境中的比较。
DOI:
10.1093/ajh/hpad120
复制
发表时间:
2024
影响因子:
3.2
通讯作者:
Ishak,AnthonyM
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Juraschek,StephenP;Vyavahare,Medha;Cluett,JenniferL;Turkson-Ocran,Ruth-Alma;Mukamal,KennethJ;Ishak,AnthonyM
BACKGROUNDSelf-measured blood pressure (SMBP) monitoring is increasingly used for remote hypertension management, but the real-world performance of home blood pressure (BP) devices is unknown. We examined BP measurements from patients’ home devices using the American Medical Association’s (AMA) SMBP Device Accuracy Test tool.METHODSPatients at a single internal medicine clinic underwent up to five seated, same-arm BP readings using a home device and an automated BP device (Omron HEM-907XL). Following the AMA’s three-step protocol, we used the patient’s home device for the first, second, and fourth measurements and the office device for the third and fifth (if needed) measurements. Device agreement failure was defined as an absolute difference in systolic BP >10 mm Hg between the home and office devices in either of two confirmatory steps. Performance was examined by brand (Omron vs. non-Omron). Moreover, we examined patient factors associated with agreement failure via logistic regression models adjusted for demographic characteristics.RESULTSWe evaluated 152 patients (mean age 60 ± 15 years, 58% women, 31% Black) seen between October 2020 and November 2021. Device agreement failure occurred in 22.4% (95% CI: 16.4%, 29.7%) of devices tested, including 19.1% among Omron devices and 27.6% among non-Omron devices (P= 0.23). No patient characteristics were associated with agreement failure.CONCLUSIONSOver one-fifth of home devices did not agree based on the AMA SMBP device accuracy protocol. These findings confirm the importance of office-based device comparisons to ensure the accuracy of home BP monitoring.