Clock speed [Reflections]

Clock speed [Reflections]
复制标题

时钟速度[思考]

DOI:
10.1109/mspec.1998.694343
复制
发表时间:
1998
期刊:
影响因子:
3.1
通讯作者:
R. Lucky
R. Lucky
中科院分区:
工程技术4区
文献类型:
--
作者:
R. Lucky

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

在这篇关于事态的评论中,笔者感到存在一种差距,值得有人担心。作者并不担心计算机会赶上人类的智能。他担心的是,当计算机忙于管理工作时,我们人类仍在以自己的悠闲步伐前进。人类并不存在摩尔定律。作者沉思着,如果我们的一天被重新定义为25小时而不是24小时,是否存在可能的解决方案。
In this commentary on the state of affairs the author feels there is a disparity that someone should worry about. The author is not concerned about computers catching up with human intelligence. His concern is that while computers hurry their administrative chores, we humans still proceed at our own leisurely pace. There is no Moore's Law for humans. The author muses on if a possible solution exists should our day be redefined to have 25 hours instead of 24.