DNA Breaks and End Resection Measured Genome-wide by End Sequencing.

DNA Breaks and End Resection Measured Genome-wide by End Sequencing.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1016/j.molcel.2016.06.034
复制
发表时间:
2016-09-01
期刊:
影响因子:
16
通讯作者:
Nussenzweig A
Nussenzweig A
中科院分区:
生物学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Canela A;Sridharan S;Sciascia N;Tubbs A;Meltzer P;Sleckman BP;Nussenzweig A

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

DNA双链断裂(DSB)发生在生理转录、DNA复制和抗原受体多样化过程中。DSB的错误标记或错误处理可导致病理性结构变异和突变。在这里,我们描述了一种灵敏的方法(END-seq)来监测DNA末端切除和DSB全基因组在体内的碱基对分辨率。我们利用END-seq来确定限制酶、锌指核酸酶和RAG诱导的DSB的频率和光谱。除了序列偏好,染色质特征决定了这些基因组修饰酶的所有功能。END-seq可以在10,000个不携带DSB的细胞中检测到每个细胞至少一个DSB,并且我们估计60个细胞中多达一个含有脱靶RAG切割。除了位点特异性切割,我们检测DSB分布在免疫球蛋白类转换重组过程中的扩展区域。因此,END-seq提供了全基因组DNA末端的快照,可用于理解基因组编辑特异性和染色质对DSB途径选择的影响。卡内拉等人开发了一种灵敏的定量方法,该方法在DNA修复之前提供了体内DNA双链断裂和末端切除的景观。这为更好地理解基因组不稳定性的原因和后果提供了可能性。
DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) arise during physiological transcription, DNA replication, and antigen receptor diversification. Mistargeting or misprocessing of DSBs can result in pathological structural variation and mutation. Here we describe a sensitive method (END-seq) to monitor DNA end resection and DSBs genome-wide at base-pair resolution in vivo. We utilized END-seq to determine the frequency and spectrum of restriction-enzyme-, zinc-finger-nuclease-, and RAG-induced DSBs. Beyond sequence preference, chromatin features dictate the repertoire of these genome-modifying enzymes. END-seq can detect at least one DSB per cell among 10,000 cells not harboring DSBs, and we estimate that up to one out of 60 cells contains off-target RAG cleavage. In addition to site-specific cleavage, we detect DSBs distributed over extended regions during immunoglobulin class-switch recombination. Thus, END-seq provides a snapshot of DNA ends genome-wide, which can be utilized for understanding genome-editing specificities and the influence of chromatin on DSB pathway choice. Canela et al. develop a sensitive and quantitative method that provides a landscape of DNA double-strand breaks and end resection in vivo prior to DNA repair. This opens up the possibility for better understanding the causes and consequences of genome instability.
DOI: 10.1038/ng.613
发表时间: 2010-08
期刊: Nature genetics
影响因子: 30.8
作者:
通讯作者: --
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-immunol-030409-101320
发表时间: 2012
影响因子: 29.7
作者:
Helmink BA;Sleckman BP
通讯作者: Sleckman BP
DOI: 10.1038/nprot.2016.043
发表时间: 2016-05
期刊: Nature protocols
影响因子: 14.8
作者:
Hu J;Meyers RM;Dong J;Panchakshari RA;Alt FW;Frock RL
通讯作者: Frock RL
DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.01.006
发表时间: 2013-01-31
期刊: Cell
影响因子: 64.5
作者:
Barlow JH;Faryabi RB;Callén E;Wong N;Malhowski A;Chen HT;Gutierrez-Cruz G;Sun HW;McKinnon P;Wright G;Casellas R;Robbiani DF;Staudt L;Fernandez-Capetillo O;Nussenzweig A
通讯作者: Nussenzweig A
DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.2408
发表时间: 2013-04
期刊: NATURE METHODS
影响因子: 48
作者:
Crosetto, Nicola;Mitra, Abhishek;Silva, Maria Joao;Bienko, Magda;Dojer, Norbert;Wang, Qi;Karaca, Elif;Chiarle, Roberto;Skrzypczak, Magdalena;Ginalski, Krzysztof;Pasero, Philippe;Rowicka, Maga;Dikic, Ivan
通讯作者: Dikic, Ivan