The Marlowe-Crowne affair: Short forms, psychometric structure, and social desirability
The Marlowe-Crowne affair: Short forms, psychometric structure, and social desirability
复制标题
DOI：
10.1207/s15327752jpa7902_11
复制
发表时间：
2002-10-01
影响因子：
3.4
通讯作者：
Barger, SD
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Barger, SD
马洛-克罗社会期望量表（Crowne & Marlowe，1960）被广泛用于评估和控制自我报告研究中的反应偏差。马洛-克朗量表的几个缩写版本已被提出并在心理学和医学中被采用。在这篇文章中，我评估了9个简短的形式，使用验证性因素分析在2个样本（合并N = 867）的充分性。有一些证据表明，不同的简短形式的充分性，但模型的充分性是不一致的样本。补充分析揭示了一个多维的结构，以充分马洛-Crowne规模，并表示，明显适当的模型适合一些简短的形式可能是一个统计工件。基于经验和概念的理由，不鼓励使用马洛-克朗量表或其各种简短形式作为反应偏差的控制。
The Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability scale (Crowne & Marlowe, 1960) is widely used to assess and control for response bias in self-report research. Several abbreviated versions of the Marlowe-Crowne scale have been proposed and adopted in psychology and medicine. In this article I evaluate the adequacy of 9 short forms using confirmatory factor analysis across 2 samples (combined N = 867). There was some evidence for the adequacy of different short forms, but model adequacy was not consistent across samples. Supplementary analyses revealed a multidimensional structure to the full Marlowe-Crowne scale and indicated that the apparent adequacy of model fit for some short forms might be a statistical artifact. Using the Marlowe-Crowne scale or its various short forms as a control for response bias is discouraged on empirical and conceptual grounds.