Criteria used by a peer review committee for selection of research fellows - A boolean probit analysis
Criteria used by a peer review committee for selection of research fellows - A boolean probit analysis
复制标题
DOI：
10.1111/j.1468-2389.2005.00326.x
复制
发表时间：
2005-12-01
影响因子：
2.2
通讯作者：
Daniel, HD
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Bornmann, L;Daniel, HD
Boehringer Ingelheim Fonds（B.I.F.）是一个促进生物医学基础研究的国际基金会，报告指出，研究生研究员根据以下主要标准获得奖学金：（1）申请人迄今为止的成就所证明的科学素质，（2）拟议研究项目的独创性，以及（3）进行研究的实验室的科学地位。使用布尔概率统计技术，本研究探讨了多个条件的因果关系，奖学金将被授予只有当所有这些标准都是由B.I.F.积极评估。同侪审查委员会。与基金会的规定原则一致，结果表明，B.I.F.只有在所有三项标准都得到肯定的评价时，才批准申请。
An international foundation for the promotion of basic research in biomedicine, the Boehringer Ingelheim Fonds (B.I.F.), reports that fellowships are awarded to post-graduate researchers according to the following main criteria: (1) scientific quality as demonstrated by the applicant's achievements to date, (2) the originality of the proposed research project, and (3) the scientific standing of the laboratory where the research will be conducted. Using the Boolean probit statistical technique, this study examines the multiple conjunctural causation that a fellowship will be awarded only if all three of these criteria are assessed positively by the B.I.F. peer review committee. In agreement with the prescriptive principles of the foundation the results suggest that the B.I.F. approves applications only if all of the three criteria are rated positively.