The Promise of Co-Design for Public Policy
The Promise of Co-Design for Public Policy
复制标题
DOI：
10.1111/1467-8500.12310
复制
发表时间：
2018-12-01
影响因子：
2.2
通讯作者：
Blomkamp, Emma
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Blomkamp, Emma
作为一种创造性地让公民和利益相关者找到复杂问题解决方案的新方法，联合设计为政策制定者带来了巨大的希望。它被吹捧为一种方式，可以产生更多创新的想法，确保政策和服务符合公民的需求，通过提高响应能力来实现经济效率，促进不同群体之间的合作和信任，有意义地接触“难以接触到的人”，并实现对变革的支持。本文考虑我们如何确定联合设计是否具有显著改进政策过程和结果的真正潜力。本文借鉴了参与式设计、设计思维和公共部门创新的相关文献，探讨了公共政策背景下共同设计的意义和潜力。它强调了参与式设计的哲学基础和规范影响，并质疑在当代决策具有挑战性的背景下实现所承诺的结果的可行性。
As a novel method for creatively engaging citizens and stakeholders to find solutions to complex problems, co-design holds great promise for policy makers. It has been vaunted as a way to generate more innovative ideas, ensure policies and services match the needs of citizens, achieve economic efficiencies by improving responsiveness, foster cooperation and trust between different groups, meaningfully engage the 'hard to reach', and achieve support for change. This article considers how we might determine whether co-design has real potential to dramatically improve policy processes and outcomes. Drawing on relevant literature on participatory design, design thinking and public sector innovation, this review explores the meaning and potential of co-design in the context of public policy. It highlights the philosophical underpinnings and normative implications of participatory design, and questions the feasibility of achieving the promised outcomes in the challenging context of contemporary policy making.