Selection of Ideal Reference Genes for Gene Expression Analysis in COVID-19 and Mucormycosis.
Selection of Ideal Reference Genes for Gene Expression Analysis in COVID-19 and Mucormycosis.
复制标题
在COVID-19和粘膜细胞增多中选择理想的参考基因进行基因表达分析。
DOI:
10.1128/spectrum.01656-22
复制
发表时间:
2022-12-21
影响因子:
3.7
通讯作者:
Saini, Vikram
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Kumar, Sunil;Ahmad, Ayaan;Kushwaha, Namrata;Shokeen, Niti;Negi, Sheetal;Gautam, Kamini;Singh, Anup;Tiwari, Pavan;Garg, Rakesh;Agarwal, Richa;Mohan, Anant;Trikha, Anjan;Thakar, Alok;Saini, Vikram
Selection of reference genes during real-time quantitative PCR (qRT-PCR) is critical to determine accurate and reliable mRNA expression. Nonetheless, not a single study has investigated the expression stability of candidate reference genes to determine their suitability as internal controls in SARS-CoV-2 infection or COVID-19-associated mucormycosis (CAM). Using qRT-PCR, we determined expression stability of the nine most commonly used housekeeping genes, namely, TATA-box binding protein (TBP), cyclophilin (CypA), β-2-microglobulin (B2M), 18S rRNA (18S), peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARG) coactivator 1 alpha (PGC-1α), glucuronidase beta (GUSB), hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase 1 (HPRT-1), β-ACTIN, and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) in patients with COVID-19 of various severities (asymptomatic, mild, moderate, and severe) and those with CAM. We used statistical algorithms (delta-CT [threshold cycle], NormFinder, BestKeeper, GeNorm, and RefFinder) to select the most appropriate reference gene and observed that clinical severity profoundly influences expression stability of reference genes. CypA demonstrated the most consistent expression irrespective of disease severity and emerged as the most suitable reference gene in COVID-19 and CAM. Incidentally, GAPDH, the most commonly used reference gene, showed the maximum variations in expression and emerged as the least suitable. Next, we determined expression of nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (NRF2), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and IL-15 using CypA and GAPDH as internal controls and show that CypA-normalized expression matches well with the RNA sequencing-based expression of these genes. Further, IL-6 expression correlated well with the plasma levels of IL-6 and C-reactive protein, a marker of inflammation. In conclusion, GAPDH emerged as the least suitable and CypA as the most suitable reference gene in COVID-19 and CAM. The results highlight the expression variability of housekeeping genes due to disease severity and provide a strong rationale for identification of appropriate reference genes in other chronic conditions as well. IMPORTANCE Gene expression studies are critical to develop new diagnostics, therapeutics, and prognostic modalities. However, accurate determination of expression requires data normalization with a reference gene, whose expression does not vary across different disease stages. Misidentification of a reference gene can produce inaccurate results. Unfortunately, despite the global impact of COVID-19 and an urgent unmet need for better treatment, not a single study has investigated the expression stability of housekeeping genes across the disease spectrum to determine their suitability as internal controls. Our study identifies CypA and then TBP as the two most suitable reference genes for COVID-19 and CAM. Further, GAPDH, the most commonly used reference gene in COVID-19 studies, turned out to be the least suitable. This work fills an important gap in the field and promises to facilitate determination of an accurate expression of genes to catalyze development of novel molecular diagnostics and therapeutics for improved patient care.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
4.8
作者:
Geyer, Henriette;Bauer, Michael;Mankertz, Annette
通讯作者:
Mankertz, Annette
DOI:
10.1016/s1473-3099(20)30486-2
发表时间:
2021-03
期刊:
The Lancet. Infectious diseases
影响因子:
--
作者:
McClain MT;Constantine FJ;Nicholson BP;Nichols M;Burke TW;Henao R;Jones DC;Hudson LL;Jaggers LB;Veldman T;Mazur A;Park LP;Suchindran S;Tsalik EL;Ginsburg GS;Woods CW
通讯作者:
Woods CW
影响因子:
2.7
作者:
Dheda, K;Huggett, JF;Zumla, A
通讯作者:
Zumla, A
DOI:
10.1073/pnas.1121249109
发表时间:
2012-10-16
影响因子:
11.1
作者:
Lam, Lucia L.;Emberly, Eldon;Kobor, Michael S.
通讯作者:
Kobor, Michael S.
影响因子:
--
作者:
Ahn K;Huh JW;Park SJ;Kim DS;Ha HS;Kim YJ;Lee JR;Chang KT;Kim HS
通讯作者:
Kim HS