Optimal operation of photovoltaic/diesel generator/pumped water reservoir power system using modified manta ray optimization
Optimal operation of photovoltaic/diesel generator/pumped water reservoir power system using modified manta ray optimization
复制标题
使用改进的蝠鲼优化来优化光伏/柴油发电机/抽水蓄水池电力系统的运行
DOI:
10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125733
复制
发表时间:
2021-03
影响因子:
11.1
通讯作者:
Kittisak Jermsittiparsert
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Bingzhi Liu;Zizeng Wang;Li Feng;Kittisak Jermsittiparsert
To fully utilize the renewable energy sources and increase the power system reliability with high penetration of renewable energy sources, hybridization with other renewable or nonrenewable sources as well as energy storage systems is highly recommended. This paper studies a hybrid power system consisting of solar panels, a diesel generator, and a pumped water reservoir. In this system, the excess solar energy is used to pump the water into the water storage for later use. When solar energy is not enough to supply the demand, diesel generation and pumped water reservoir help supply the demand. Due to the nonlinear nature of fuel consumption of diesel generator, an optimum amount of power generated by this unit can lead to cost-saving. This leads to an optimization problem, which is solved by an optimization technique proposed in this paper. The optimization used is named manta ray optimization and is based on the improved version of the manta ray foraging technique. The simulation results obtained from the proposed technique, the conventional manta ray foraging technique, and other well-known techniques are compared to the proposed method to prove better performance and robustness of the proposed method. Three scenarios are analyzed here which are associated with high, normal, and low solar radiation, which are respectively related to maximum, average, and minimum solar irradiance in the studied year. In the case of low solar radiation, optimization is not required as DG is the only auxiliary generation unit. The fuel consumptions using the proposed optimization technique are averagely 6.14% and 5.96% better in scenarios 1 and 2, respectively. Moreover, the robustness achieved by this optimization method is 17.94% and 48.41% higher in scenarios 1 and 2, respectively.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
4.6
作者:
Xiao Xu;Weihao Hu;Di Cao;Wen Liu;Zhe Chen;H. Lund
通讯作者:
Xiao Xu;Weihao Hu;Di Cao;Wen Liu;Zhe Chen;H. Lund
DOI:
10.1007/s12652-017-0600-7
发表时间:
2019-01-01
影响因子:
--
作者:
Mirzapour, Farzaneh;Lakzaei, Mostafa;Ghadimi, Noradin
通讯作者:
Ghadimi, Noradin
DOI:
10.1016/s0262-1762(03)01102-7
发表时间:
2003
期刊:
--
影响因子:
--
作者:
Larry Bachus;Á. Custodio;Á. Custodio
通讯作者:
Larry Bachus;Á. Custodio;Á. Custodio
DOI:
10.1080/15567036.2019.1680770
发表时间:
2019-10-22
影响因子:
2.9
作者:
Xi Fei;Ruan Xuejun;Razmjooy, Navid
通讯作者:
Razmjooy, Navid
影响因子:
10.4
作者:
Weiping Zhang;A. Maleki;M. Rosen;Jing-qing Liu
通讯作者:
Weiping Zhang;A. Maleki;M. Rosen;Jing-qing Liu