STRESS-TIMING AND SYLLABLE-TIMING REANALYZED
STRESS-TIMING AND SYLLABLE-TIMING REANALYZED
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/s0095-4470(19)30776-4
复制
发表时间：
1983-01-01
影响因子：
1.9
通讯作者：
DAUER, RM
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
DAUER, RM
从英语，泰语，西班牙语，意大利语和希腊语的连续文本的数据的比较表明，在英语中的重音间隔，强调定时的语言，是没有更多的isoblasts比西班牙语中的重音间隔，音节定时的语言，或任何其他语言的调查。重音有规律地重复出现的倾向似乎是语言的普遍属性。重音计时语言和音节计时语言的区别在于音节结构、元音弱化、重音的语音实现及其对语言系统的影响方面的差异。语言、语言变体或语言的历史阶段可以或多或少地被认为是基于压力的，具体取决于这些特征的差异。甚至在那些被称为音节计时的语言中，节奏组合也很可能发生。
Comparisons of data from continuous texts in English, Thai, Spanish, Italian and Greek, show that interstress intervals in English, a stress-timed language, are no more isochronous than interstress intervals in Spanish, a syllable-timed language, or any of the other languages investigated. A tendency for stresses to recur regularly appears to be a language universal property. The difference between stress-timed and syllable-timed languages has to do with differences in syllable structure, vowel reduction, and the phonetic realization of stress and its influence on the linguistic system. Languages, language varieties, or historical stages of a language can be considered more or less stress-based depending on differences in these characteristics. It seems likely that rhythmic grouping takes place even in languages which have been called syllable-timed.