The White Bear Story
The White Bear Story
复制标题
白熊的故事
DOI：
10.1080/1047840x.2003.9682900
复制
发表时间：
2003
影响因子：
9.3
通讯作者：
D. J. Schneider
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
D. Wegner;D. J. Schneider
评论自己的文章是危险的。没有一个好的方式来做到这一点。一个极端是，获奖者滔滔不绝的幽灵（“你真的喜欢我”）说得太长，把本应是快乐的时刻变成了一个自我庆祝的狂欢。另一个极端是那些谦逊的评论员，他们花了太多时间对所有的小人物表示夸张的感谢，或者说自己站在巨人的肩膀上，以至于成就看起来像是一个大错误。假设自恋和谄媚之间有一条细线，我们可能会在几页纸上走钢丝，我们同意写一篇关于我们的文章的文章。所以，让我们快速浏览一下白色熊研究的起源（Wegner，Schneider，Carter，&白色，1987）。我们这样做是为了一瞥我们认为可能是这个想法的开端，一瞥它似乎已经导致了什么，以及一般“经典”文章的本质。我们已经感觉有点不平衡了，所以让我们继续吧。
It is dangerous to comment on your own article. There just isn’t a good way to do it. At one extreme is the specter of the gushing award-winner (“You really like me”) who goes on too long, turning what should be a happy moment into an unseemly orgy of self-congratulation. At the other extreme is the self-effacing commentator who spends so much time in exaggerated thankfulness to all the little people, or in remarks about standing on the shoulders of giants, that the accomplishment looks like a big mistake. On the assumption that there is a fine line between narcissism and toadyism, and that we might somehow tightrope on it for just a few pages, we have agreed to write an article about an article of ours. So, let’s take a quick look at the origins of the white bear studies (Wegner, Schneider, Carter, & White, 1987). We do so with a glimpse at what we think might have been the beginnings of the idea, a glance at where it seems to have led, and a peek at the nature of “classic” articles in general. Already we’re feeling slightly off balance, so let’s get on with it.