In practice, chimp memory study flawed.
In practice, chimp memory study flawed.
复制标题
在实践中，黑猩猩的记忆研究存在缺陷。
DOI：
10.1126/science.328.5983.1228-c
复制
发表时间：
2010
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Cook P
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Cook P
关于科学、语言和读写能力的特别章节（4 月 23 日，第 447 页）解决了阅读科学论文的挑战。然而，本节中的文章说明了他们所讨论的问题。考虑一下 CE Snow 的观点（第 450 页）第二段中的长句子以及方括号、括号、逗号和破折号的数量。很明显，为什么即使是科学家也只阅读自己领域的论文。总的来说，每篇论文中的句子几乎都需要图表化才能理解。我特别喜欢 P. van den Broek (p. 453) 发现有必要在他的论文摘要中插入两组括号。
THE SPECIAL SECTION ON SCIENCE, LANGUAGE, AND LITERACY (23 April, p. 447) addresses the challenge of reading scientific papers. Yet the articles in this section illustrate the very problem they discuss. Consider the long sentences and the number of brackets, parentheses, commas, and dashes in the second paragraph of CE Snow’s Perspective (p. 450). It is apparent why even scientists only read papers in their own field. Collectively, the sentences in each paper almost need to be diagrammed in order to be understood. I particularly like how P. van den Broek (p. 453) found it necessary to insert two sets of parentheses in the abstract of his paper.