Process, not representation: reply to Radvansky (1999).
Process, not representation: reply to Radvansky (1999).
复制标题
过程，而非表征：回复 Radvansky (1999)。
DOI：
10.1037//0096-3445.128.2.207
复制
发表时间：
1999
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Reder,LM
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Anderson,JR;Reder,LM
粉丝效应的大小是由检索过程决定的，而不是由信息是否表示为情境决定的。证据与 GA Radvansky (1999) 的主张相矛盾，即从情境中检索信息的时间并不取决于情境中元素的数量。此外，拉德万斯基将情景模型归因于实验的原则似乎是重新描述数据的事后方式。另一方面，证据确实支持思维理性自适应控制（ACT-R）假设，即参与者可以调整他们的注意力权重，从而产生不同的粉丝效应。此外，ACT-R 风扇效应理论与许多其他发现是一致的。
The size of fan effects is determined by processes at retrieval, not by whether or not information is represented as situations. Evidence contradicts GA Radvansky's (1999) claim that time to retrieve information from a situation does not depend on the number of elements in the situation. Moreover, Radvansky's principles for ascribing situational models to experiments appear to be post hoc ways of redescribing the data. On the other hand, the evidence does support the Adaptive Control of Thought—Rational (ACT–R) assumption that participants can adjust their attentional weightings and so produce differential fan effects. Moreover, the ACT–R theory of the fan effect is consistent with many other findings.