Regulating effect of LIF on the expression of FuT7: Probe into the mechanism of sLex in implantation
Regulating effect of LIF on the expression of FuT7: Probe into the mechanism of sLex in implantation
复制标题
DOI:
10.1002/mrd.21055
复制
发表时间:
2009-08
影响因子:
2.5
通讯作者:
Q. Zhang;S. Liu;Zm Zhu;Q. Yan
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Q. Zhang;S. Liu;Zm Zhu;Q. Yan
Implantation is a developmental process regulated through the interaction of various implantation-related factors (Paria et al., 2002). Many studies have paid attention to the functions of fucosylated oligosaccharides highly expressed by the embryo and uterus during the implantation period. A marked increase in the expression of sialyl Lewis X (sLe) by the uterus and L-selectin by the blastocyst have been reported, consistent with the observation that sLe are crucial mediators in the recognition and adhesion of trophoblasts to uterine endometrium at the implantation window (Genbacev et al., 2003). However the regulation of sLe expression and its role during implantation is unclear. The objective of our study was to investigate the relationship between leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF), an essential cytokine for embryo implantation in human and rodent, and the synthesis of sLe via the expression of fucosyltransferase VII (FuT7), a key enzyme of sLe fucosylation. The mouse embryos of morula stage were collected at the fourth day after mating from uteri. After incubating morulae in media containing LIF (0.1, 1, 10, 100 ng/ml) or anti-LIF antibody (3mg/ml) contained in Ham’s F-10 medium for 8 h or 4 h, respectively, FuT7 mRNA and protein levels were examined using Real-time PCR, direct immunofluorescence and dot immunoblot. Results are given as means SD for three independent experiments. The statistical significance of differences between groups was analyzed by nonparametric test; P<0.05 was considered to be significant. Our results showed that LIF up-regulated FuT7 gene and enzyme expression in the embryo, whereas anti-LIF antibody had a reverse effect. The effect of LIF on FuT7 gene expression was dose-dependent in 0.1–100 ng/ml concentrations. Ten nanograms per milliliter was optimum and the expression was weakened in 100 ng/ml, which was coincident with the report that the excessive concentration of LIF (100 ng/ml) may restrain growth of the embryo or be poisonous to it. These results demonstrated that LIF has a bimodal function in regulating the development of embryo, hence we must choose the doses of LIF carefully in the experiments and clinical applications. In addition, the effect of LIF on the expression of sLe was also assayed by dot immunoblot, which showed the same tendency as that of LIF on FuT7 expression (Fig. 1). Successful implantation requires cross-talking between the competent embryo and receptive uterus. The stagespecifically expressed sLe on the embryo is closely related to the recognition and adhesion potential. Therefore, increasing the expression of sLe by LIF may be an important way for LIF to accomplish its functions in promoting embryo development and increasing the implantation rate of mouse embryo (Mitchell et al., 2002). In conclusion, we provide the evidence that LIF can up-regulate the gene and protein expression of FuT7 on the embryo. sLe expression may be affected by LIF via FuT7, thus sLe connects with the regulatory network of implantation. To clarify the roles of this regulatory network, further studies on the precise molecular mechanisms are needed.