Neither pragmatic adaptation nor misguided accommodation: Modernisation as domination in the Chilean and British Left
Neither pragmatic adaptation nor misguided accommodation: Modernisation as domination in the Chilean and British Left
复制标题
既不是务实的适应，也不是误导性的迁就：现代化在智利和英国左翼中占主导地位
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2007
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
David Bailey
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
S. Motta;David Bailey
本文对议会左翼政党现代化的主流学术概念提出质疑。根据这些说法，“现代化”要么被视为对国际社会经济变化的务实适应，要么被视为对新自由主义价值观、规范和实践的误导性适应。在这两种解释中，左翼政党被认为是被动地对使其行动背景化的结构做出反应。发展一个新葛兰西的角度来看，并使用智利社会党和英国工党为例，我们认为，现代化可以更充分地概念化的过程中，左翼政党在当代新自由主义的历史集团内运作，积极促进（重新）生产新自由主义霸权。
This article contests prevailing academic conceptions of the modernisation of parliamentary Left parties. According to these accounts, ‘modernisation’ is viewed either as a pragmatic adaptation to international socioeconomic change, or as a misguided accommodation of ascendant neoliberal values, norms and practices. In both of these accounts, Left parties are perceived as passively reacting to the structures that contextualise their actions. Developing a neo-Gramscian perspective and using the Chilean Socialist Party and the British Labour Party as examples, we argue that modernisation can be more adequately conceptualised as the process by which Left parties operate within the contemporary neoliberal historical bloc, actively contributing to the (re)production of neoliberal hegemony.