The Law and Politics of the Kosovo Advisory Opinion
The Law and Politics of the Kosovo Advisory Opinion
复制标题
科索沃法律和政治咨询意见
DOI：
10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198717515.003.0017
复制
发表时间：
2015
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Gow J
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Gow J
国际法院2010年7月发表的咨询意见几乎没有改变科索沃的局势，只是将其从一个灰色地带转移到另一个灰色地带。长期存在的国家地位和主权问题需要进行概念和政治创新，以建立一个新的框架。建立一个欧盟“自由领土”将提供这一框架。为解决科索沃难题提出的其他选择以及国际参与和建设和平都是不够的。欧盟科索沃“自由领土”概念的采纳将使科索沃、塞尔维亚、欧盟以及包括美国在内的其他各方受益，并将得到联合国安理会理事会的支持。“自由联合”协议的自愿性质将消除任何反对的理由。欧盟将能够保持团结和共识，并能够就科索沃的未来发展作出重要决定。
The ICJ Advisory Opinion, delivered in July 2010, did little to change the situation regarding Kosovo, which it moved from one grey area to another. The long-running statehood and sovereignty problem needed the conceptual and political innovation necessary for a fresh framework. The creation of an EU'free territory'would provide that framework. Other options put forward for resolving the Kosovo conundrum, as well as international engagement and peacebuilding, have been inadequate. The adoption of the EU Kosovo'free territory'concept would benefit all concerned-in Kosovo, Serbia, the EU, and beyond, including the US, and would be endorsed by the UN Security Council. The voluntary nature of a'free association'agreement would remove any grounds for objection. The EU would be able to maintain unity and consensus, and be in a position to take important decisions regarding the future development of Kosovo.