Mapping the community: use of research evidence in policy and practice
Mapping the community: use of research evidence in policy and practice
复制标题
DOI：
10.1057/s41599-020-00571-2
复制
发表时间：
2020-09-07
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Boaz, Annette
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Farley-Ripple, Elizabeth N.;Oliver, Kathryn;Boaz, Annette
研究证据（URE）在政策和实践中的使用与许多学科以及政策和实践领域相关。尽管人们越来越关注如何使用这些证据，但从事该领域学术和实践的人们在推进该领域面临着挑战。本文试图“绘制该领域的地图”，目的是引发关于我们所处位置以及我们需要向前迈进的内容的对话。利用与研究证据的使用相关的学者、从业者和资助者的调查数据，我们探讨了 URE 工作在多大程度上跨越了研究、实践和政策、不同实践/政策领域和不同学科的传统界限。描述性和网络分析指出了这个社区的边界跨越和多学科性，但也表明了这项工作所建立的学科和文献之间的排他性和碎片化。最后，我们提出了改善 URE 奖学金的连通性、包容性、与政策和实践的关系以及可持续性的机会。
The use of research evidence (URE) in policy and practice is relevant to many academic disciplines, as well as policy and practice domains. Although there has been increased attention to how such evidence is used, those engaged in scholarship and practice in this area face challenges in advancing the field. This paper attempts to "map the field" with the objective of provoking conversation about where we are and what we need to move forward. Utilizing survey data from scholars, practitioners, and funders connected to the study of the use of research evidence, we explore the extent to which URE work span traditional boundaries of research, practice, and policy, of different practice/policy fields, and of different disciplines. Descriptive and network analyses point to the boundary spanning and multidisciplinarity of this community, but also suggest exclusivity, as well as fragmentation among disciplines and literatures on which this work builds. We conclude with opportunities for to improve the connectedness, inclusiveness, relationship to policy and practice, and sustainability of URE scholarship.