Writing Disability History: Problems, perspectives and sources
Writing Disability History: Problems, perspectives and sources
复制标题
书写残疾历史：问题、观点和来源
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
1999
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Elizabeth Bredberg
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Elizabeth Bredberg
本文讨论了目前的趋势，写作障碍，并确定固有的问题，在普遍关注的历史上的机构治疗的障碍和残疾，无论是在其有效性的历史，并在他们缺乏贡献的解放层面的残疾研究。有人建议，残疾历史的更广泛的观点可能会实现有关残疾的其他角度比机构的检查，并确定其他两个角度，白话和经验。这些研究的原始资料往往与制度史的资料大不相同，而且在对它们的解释中发现了一些潜在的风险。它表明，历史研究者确定他们使用的来源中存在的观点，作为减少解释谬误风险的一种手段。本文还讨论了微观历史的潜在贡献。
This paper discusses current trends in writing disability and identifies problems inherent in the prevalent focus on history of institutional treatment of impairment and disability, both in their validity as history and in their lack of contribution to the emancipatory dimension of disability studies. It is suggested that a broader view of disability history might be achieved by examination of other perspectives regarding disability than the institutional and identify two other perspectives, vernacular and experiential. The source material of these is often quite unlike that of institutional history, and identifies some potential risks in their interpretation. It suggests that investigators of history identify the perspectives present in the sources that they use as a means of reducing the risk of interpretive fallacies. The potential contribution of microhistory is also discussed.