Questionnaires Measuring Patients’ Spiritual Needs: A Narrative Literature Review

Questionnaires Measuring Patients’ Spiritual Needs: A Narrative Literature Review
复制标题

衡量患者精神需求的问卷:叙事文献综述

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2016
影响因子:
1
通讯作者:
Somayeh Azarnik
Somayeh Azarnik
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Ruohollah Seddigh;Amir;Somayeh Azarnik

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

背景本综述的目的是收集已发表的精神需求调查问卷,并清晰地呈现该领域的研究状况。证据获取 首先,在以下数据库中进行了不限时间跨度(截至 2015 年 6 月)或语言的电子检索:PubMed、Scopus、Ovid、ProQuest 和 Google Scholar。搜索中包含了关键词“宗教”和“精神”以及“需求”及其同义词的所有派生词。然后选择引入新工具的研究并将其纳入研究中。由于该领域的问卷数量有限,并且没有考虑是否存在或缺乏确切的标准化信息,因此所有问卷都包含在最终报告中。结果共获得8份问卷:患者精神需求评估量表(PSNAS)、精神需求量表(SNI)、疾病相关精神兴趣工具(SpIRIT)、精神需求问卷(SpNQ)、患者精神需求评估(SNAP)、精神需求量表(SNS)、精神护理需求量表(SCNI)、姑息治疗精神需求问卷。结论 这些问卷是从有限的医学角度设计的,并且经常涉及文化概念,这使得其跨文化适用性变得复杂。
Context The objective of the present review was to collect published spiritual needs questionnaires and to present a clear image of the research condition of this domain. Evidence Acquisition First, an electronic search was conducted with no limits on time span (until June 2015) or language in the following databases: PubMed, Scopus, Ovid, ProQuest and Google Scholar. All derivations of the keywords religion and spiritual alongside need and its synonyms were included in the search. Researches that introduced new tools was then selected and included in the study. Due to the limited quantity of questionnaires in this domain and with no consideration given to the existence or lack of exact standardization information, all of the questionnaires were included in the final report. Results Eight questionnaires were found: patients spiritual needs assessment scale (PSNAS), spiritual needs inventory (SNI), spiritual interests related to illness tool (SpIRIT), spiritual needs questionnaire (SpNQ), spiritual needs assessment for patients (SNAP), spiritual needs scale (SNS), spiritual care needs inventory (SCNI), and spiritual needs questionnaire for palliative care. Conclusions These questionnaires have been designed from a limited medical perspective and often involve cultural concepts which complicate their cross-cultural applicability.