Effects of angiotensin-(1-7) blockade on renal function in rats with enhanced intrarenal Ang II activity

Effects of angiotensin-(1-7) blockade on renal function in rats with enhanced intrarenal Ang II activity
复制标题

DOI:
10.1111/j.1523-1755.2005.00222.x
复制
发表时间:
2005-04-01
影响因子:
19.6
通讯作者:
Cervenka, L
Cervenka, L
中科院分区:
医学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Bürgelová, M;Kramer, HJ;Cervenka, L

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

背景越来越多的证据表明,血管紧张素-(1-7)[Ang-(1-7)]在肾素-血管紧张素系统(RAS)被激活时作为Ang II的内源性拮抗剂发挥作用。因此,在本研究中,我们比较了急性肾内(i.r.)Ang-(1-7)受体阻断剂在正常和肾内Ang II浓度升高条件下对肾功能的影响。将充满盐的Hannover-Sprague道利大鼠(HanSD)作为对照动物。作为Ang II增强作用的模型,我们首先使用携带Ren-2肾素基因(TGR)的转基因大鼠,其次使用Ang II输注大鼠,第三使用正常盐摄入的双肾单夹(2K 1C)高血压大鼠,第四使用盐耗尽的TGR和HanSD。I.R. Ang-(1-7)受体阻断剂可显著降低2K 1C大鼠的肾小球滤过率(GFR)、肾血浆流量(RPF)和钠排泄量,并可降低去盐TGR和HanSD大鼠的钠排泄量。相比之下,I.R. Ang-(1-7)受体阻断剂对高盐TGR和HanSD以及Ang II灌注大鼠的GFR、RPF和钠排泄无显著影响。这些发现表明,在正常肾内RAS活性和通过输注Ang II或通过在充满盐的条件下插入肾素基因而增加肾内Ang II作用的条件下,Ang-(1-7)不是调节肾功能的重要因素。相反,在由于肾动脉夹闭或钠限制引起的内源性RAS激活的条件下,Ang-(1-7)充当Ang II的血管收缩作用的对手。
Background. Increasing evidence suggests that angiotensin-(1-7) [Ang-(1-7)] acts as an endogenous antagonist of Ang II when the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) is activated. In the present study, we therefore compared the effects of acute intrarenal (i.r.) Ang-(1-7) receptor blockade on renal function under conditions of normal and increased intrarenal Ang II concentration.Methods. Salt-replete Hannover-Sprague Dawley rats (HanSD) served as control animals. As models with enhanced action of Ang II we first used transgenic rats harboring the Ren-2 renin gene (TGR), second, Ang II-infused rats, third, 2-kidney, 1-clip (2K1C) hypertensive rats on normal salt intake, and fourth, salt-depleted TGR and HanSD.Results. I.r. Ang-(1-7) receptor blockade elicited significant decreases in glomerular filtration rate (GFR), renal plasma flow (RPF), and sodium excretion in 2K1C rats, and in salt-depleted TGR and HanSD. In contrast, i.r. Ang-(1-7) receptor blockade did not significantly change GFR, RPF, and sodium excretion in salt-replete TGR and HanSD, or in Ang II-infused rats.Conclusion. These findings suggest that under conditions of normal intrarenal RAS activity and increased intrarenal Ang II action by infusion of Ang II or by insertion of a renin gene in salt-replete conditions, Ang-(1-7) is not an important factor in the regulation of renal function. In contrast, under conditions of endogenous RAS activation due to clipping of the renal artery or to sodium restriction, Ang-(1-7) serves as opponent of the vasoconstrictor actions of Ang II.