An empiric evaluation of confirmation methods for optical see-through head-mounted display calibration
An empiric evaluation of confirmation methods for optical see-through head-mounted display calibration
复制标题
光学透视头戴式显示器校准确认方法的经验评估
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2011
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
G. Klinker
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
P. Maier;Arindam Dey;C. Waechter;C. Sandor;M. Tönnis;G. Klinker
光学透视头戴式显示器的校准是增强现实中正确物体对准的重要基础。 OSTHMD 的任何校准过程都需要用户将屏幕空间中的 2D 点与现实世界中的 3D 点对齐，并确认每次对齐。在这张海报中，我们展示了经验评估的结果，我们比较了四种确认方法：键盘、手持、语音和等待。等待方法旨在减少确认过程中的头部运动，其准确性明显高于所有其他方法。此外，在确认时间之前对用户输入采样的时间范围进行平均还提高了所有方法的准确性。我们进行了进一步的专家研究，证明通过视频透视头戴式显示器获得的结果也适用于光学透视头戴式显示器校准。
The calibration of optical see-through head-mounted displays is an important fundament for correct object alignment in augmented reality. Any calibration process for OSTHMDs requires users to align 2D points in screen space with 3D points in the real world and to confirm each alignment. In this poster, we present the results of our empiric evaluation where we compared four confirmation methods: Keyboard, Hand-held, Voice, and Waiting. The Waiting method, designed to reduce head motion during confirmation, showed a significantly higher accuracy than all other methods. Averaging over a time frame for sampling user input before the time of confirmation improved the accuracy of all methods in addition. We conducted a further expert study proving that the results achieved with a video see-through head-mounted display showed valid for optical see-through head-mounted display calibration, too.
望远镜眼镜对正常视力和弱视力时头部稳定性的影响。
DOI：
--
发表时间：
1990
期刊：
Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation
影响因子：
--
作者：
Demer,JL;Goldberg,J;Porter,FI
通讯作者：
Porter,FI