False recognition occurs more frequently during source identification than during old-new recognition
False recognition occurs more frequently during source identification than during old-new recognition
复制标题
DOI：
10.1037/0278-7393.27.2.375
复制
发表时间：
2001-03-01
影响因子：
2.6
通讯作者：
Marsh, RL
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Hicks, JL;Marsh, RL
最近的一些报告已经使用Deese-Roediger-McDermott（DRM）范式的变体研究了错误记忆。由于这些错误的记忆一直难以消除，本研究调查是否可以减少错误识别的决策过程中纳入源监控标准。对学习项目的方式提出主张应该需要对记忆进行更仔细的审查，因此与新旧识别指令相比，源指令应该最大限度地减少错误识别。在3个实验中，不同的组合的来源，错误识别增加，而不是减少应用源监控过程。这些违反直觉的结果的理论意义进行了讨论的新旧检测源判断的组成部分。
A number of recent reports have investigated false memories using variants of the Deese-Roediger-McDermott (DRM) paradigm. Because these false memories have been difficult to eliminate, this study investigated whether false recognition could be reduced by incorporating source-monitoring criteria into decision processes. Making claims about the manner in which items were learned should require more careful scrutiny of memories, and therefore false recognition should be minimized with source instructions as compared with old-new recognition instructions. In 3 experiments that varied the combination of sources, false recognition was increased rather than reduced by applying source-monitoring processes. The theoretical implications of these counterintuitive results are discussed in terms of the old-new detection component of source judgments.