addressing faculty publishing concerns with open access journal quality indicators
addressing faculty publishing concerns with open access journal quality indicators
复制标题
通过开放获取期刊质量指标解决教师出版问题
DOI：
10.7710/2162-3309.1133
复制
发表时间：
2014
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Max Eckard
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Sarah Beaubien;Max Eckard
背景学术出版范式正在不断发展以拥抱创新的开放获取出版模式。虽然这种环境促进了高质量、同行评审的开放获取出版物的创作，但它也为期刊或出版商从事不专业或不道德的做法提供了机会。文献综述教师在决定在哪里发表论文时会考虑许多因素，包括期刊是否从事道德出版实践。图书馆员和学者尝试通过多种方式解决这个问题，例如生成道德/不道德的出版商名单和一般指南。项目描述 为了回应教职人员对该领域日益增长的关注，大谷州立大学图书馆制定并评估了一套开放获取期刊质量指标，以支持教职人员努力识别道德和不道德的开放获取出版物的特征。下一步 联络图书馆员已经开始使用这些指标作为催化剂，引发围绕开放获取出版和学术的对话。展望未来，图书馆将继续评估和收集有关指标的反馈，同时考虑到新出现的趋势和做法。
background the scholarly publishing paradigm is evolving to embrace innovative open access publication models. while this environment fosters the creation of high-quality, peer-reviewed open access publications, it also provides opportunities for journals or publishers to engage in unprofessional or unethical practices. literature review faculty take into account a number of factors in deciding where to publish, including whether or not a journal engages in ethical publishing practices. librarians and scholars have attempted to address this issue in a number of ways, such as generating lists of ethical/unethical publishers and general guides. description of project in response to growing faculty concern in this area, the grand valley state university libraries developed and evaluated a set of open access journal quality indicators that support faculty in their effort to identify the characteristics of ethical and unethical open access publications. next steps liaison librarians have already begun using the indicators as a catalyst in sparking conversation around open access publishing and scholarship. going forward, the libraries will continue to evaluate and gather feedback on the indicators, taking into account emerging trends and practices.