Wildlife of the Tibetan Steppes
Wildlife of the Tibetan Steppes
复制标题
DOI:
10.1644/1545-1542(2000)081
复制
发表时间:
2000-08
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
V. Naples
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
V. Naples
T. A. Vaughan, J. M. Ryan, N. J. Czaplewski. 2000. Mammalogy. 4th ed. Saunders College Publishing, Fort Worth, Texas, 565 pp. ISBN 0-03-025034-X, price (hardcover), $86.50. This edition of a popular mammalogy textbook is attractive, the scientific illustrations are magnificent, and the print is readable with important words set in boldface type. Web sites listed at the end of each chapter suggest additional information. A mammalogy textbook is a treatise on one hand and a learning device for a student on the other. Years ago, this reviewer's class was mostly graduate students in vertebrate zoology, some had courses in paleontology, and all had comparative anatomy. In my teaching (63 semesters with 2–3 classes each), students were mostly undergraduates. I love this book, but for many students today it extends well beyond their available time and earlier coursework. Even for less-advanced mammalogy classes, certainly to be considered important, instructors will find this comprehensive work helpful. In “Classification,” within the Introduction (Chapter 1), one appreciates the quote from George Gaylord Simpson (1945) about putting all things into formal arrangement. Simpson continued further that modern taxonomy includes other sciences, and that studies on phylogeny will extend mammalian taxonomy a couple of centuries. To him, and to us, taxonomy (or what our authors call “systematics”) becomes mammalogy. This text introduces students to powerful, modern phyletics. The authors introduce early in the book terms as synapomorphies and outgroups, all part of the powerful, modern way of making phylogenetic dendrograms. This is painful initiation for field-oriented students of general biology and wildlife management. However, terms such as phylogeny, homology, and analogy ought to be introduced. Analogy and homology are not confined to interspecific comparisons (e.g., serial homology is the basis of the dental formula). The text has a drawback in hardly emphasizing the Linnaean system, and not naming Carolus Linnaeus as the starting point of our taxonomy. Nomenclature is never defined; such a technological text should mention its basic rules: priority, synonymy, …