New Technologies to Combat Herbicide Resistance
New Technologies to Combat Herbicide Resistance
复制标题
DOI:
10.1564/v30_apr_09
复制
发表时间:
2020-04
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
R. Edwards
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
R. Edwards
to use modern chemical and biological technology to counter resistance? I would argue the answer to that question is most patently no; solutions are around the corner if we choose to develop them. When bacteria or animals become resistant to multimillion dollar drugs, we do not abandon the therapy. Rather scientists establish the resistance mechanisms and develop chemical or biological treatments that suppress them. For example, the development of resistance to penicillin and related chemistries prompted the development of Augmentin, a drug that inhibited the lactamase enzyme in pathogenic bacteria that inactivated this class of antibiotics (reviewed by Gatadi et al., 2019). Similarly, in human cancer therapy, the development in multiple drug resistance in tumours has led to the development of drugs that target and inactivate the tolerance mechanism (Ruzza et al., 2009). In both cases, the key to these new interventions was to use the very best science to understand the molecular basis of drug resistance, which chemists could then target for selective inhibition. For the first time weed scientists are now gaining similar insights into herbicide resistance, opening up new possibilities to target this damaging trait. To disrupt herbicide resistance we first need to understand it. Weeds evolve tolerance to herbicides through two overarching mechanisms (Yu & Powles 2014), termed target site resistance (TSR) and non-target site resistance (NTSR). In TSR, mutations in the genes encoding proteins targeted by herbicides result in the synthesis of enzymes, or structural polypeptides that show reduced sensitivity to chemical inhibition. Providing the protein is still functional in the plant, TSR provides a rapid and powerful evolutionary route to resistance to the specific class of