Trojan horse or Rorschach blot? Creative industries discourse around the world
Trojan horse or Rorschach blot? Creative industries discourse around the world
复制标题
特洛伊木马还是罗夏墨迹？
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2009
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Stuart Cunningham
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Stuart Cunningham
对创意产业政策的最广泛和最复杂的批评之一认为，它是一种特洛伊木马，将信息社会的知识遗产及其技术官僚包袱秘密转移到文化实践领域，屈从于后者对公共资金和自我理解的正当要求，并将其与商业服务、电信等不适当的伙伴结盟，并呼吁增加通用创造力。本文回顾了这一概念在世界各地政策话语中的广泛采用，认为它可能更好地被视为罗夏污点，出于不同的原因，具有不同的侧重点和结果，而不是特洛伊木马。因此，基于空间分析，这一批评可能需要修改。同样在时间上，这种批评可能已经被后来的发展所取代，这些发展将政策重点放在了创意产业之外。
One of the most wide‐ranging and sophisticated critiques of creative industries policy argues that it is a kind of Trojan horse, secreting the intellectual heritage of the information society and its technocratic baggage into the realm of cultural practice, suborning the latter’s proper claims on the public purse and self‐understanding, and aligning it with inappropriate bedfellows such as business services, telecommunications and calls for increases in generic creativity. Reviewing the broad adoption of the concept in policy discourse around the world, this paper suggests that rather than a Trojan horse, it might be better thought of as a Rorschach blot, being invested in for varying reasons and with varying emphases and outcomes. Based on spatial analysis, then, the critique may need modification. Temporally as well, the critique may have been overtaken by later developments taking policy emphases ‘beyond’ the creative industries.