The adverse impact of heavy episodic drinkers on other college students.
The adverse impact of heavy episodic drinkers on other college students.
复制标题
DOI：
10.15288/jsa.1995.56.628
复制
发表时间：
1995-11
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
H. Wechsler;B. Moeykens;Andrea E. Davenport;Sonia Castillo;J. Hansen
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
H. Wechsler;B. Moeykens;Andrea E. Davenport;Sonia Castillo;J. Hansen
目的对大学生调查数据进行分析，评估校园重度间歇性饮酒水平对非重度间歇性饮酒大学生的影响。方法分析是基于一份随机邮寄给140所美国大学的大学生的调查。参与调查的大学共有17592名学生（69%）参与了调查。该研究将“重度”饮酒定义为男性连续饮用五杯或以上，女性连续饮用四杯或以上，并将学校大致分为两类：饮酒水平较低的学校，35%或更少的学生酗酒；中等学校（36-50%重度饮酒者）；在高饮酒水平的学校，超过50%的学生都是重度饮酒者。结果居住在高饮酒水平学校的学生对不重度饮酒的学生有不利影响。当高饮酒量学校的非重度饮酒学生与低饮酒量学校的非重度饮酒学生相比，从其他学生的饮酒中经历至少一个问题的几率是3.6比1。这种继发性酗酒影响的例子包括被殴打或袭击，财产受损或经历不受欢迎的性侵犯。结论：高校酒精预防工作应关注那些没有重度饮酒但可能受到其他学生重度饮酒不良影响的学生的需求。
OBJECTIVE College student survey data were examined to assess the impact of campus levels of heavy episodic drinking on nonheavy episodic drinking college students. METHOD Analyses are based on a survey mailed to a random sample of college students at 140 American colleges. A total of 17,592 students (69%) at participating colleges responded. The study defined "heavy" drinking as the consumption of five or more drinks in a row for men and four or more for women, and divided schools into approximately equal categories: lower drinking level schools where 35% or fewer students were heavy drinkers; midlevel schools (36-50% heavy drinkers); and high drinking level schools where over 50% of the students were heavy drinkers. RESULTS Residing on campus at high drinking level schools adversely affected students who were not engaging in heavy drinking. The odds of experiencing at least one problem from other students' drinking was 3.6 to 1 when nonheavy drinking students at high drinking level schools were compared to nonheavy drinking students at lower drinking level schools. Examples of such secondary heavy drinking effects included being hit or assaulted, having one's property damaged or experiencing an unwanted sexual advance. CONCLUSIONS College alcohol prevention efforts should include a focus on the needs of students who are not engaging in heavy drinking yet may be adversely impacted by other students' heavy drinking.