High drama on the high seas
High drama on the high seas
复制标题
公海上的精彩戏剧
DOI：
10.1177/1748048513504046
复制
发表时间：
2014
影响因子：
1.9
通讯作者：
Britain Eakin
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Shahira S Fahmy;Britain Eakin
对文献的回顾表明，对中东冲突报道的研究过多，但几乎没有任何研究被明确地框定为是从和平/战争新闻的角度发展起来的。因此，目前的研究是弥补这一缺陷的实质性努力。它考察了2010年蓝色马尔马拉事件在多大程度上是基于约翰·加尔东对和平/战争新闻的分类。对《国土报》、《卫报》和《纽约时报》156篇在线报道的内容分析表明，三家报纸发表的战争/和平叙事存在总体差异。还注意到所使用的几个和平指标的有效性。作者强烈主张需要重新定义和平新闻的指标，以反映与客观和事实报道不同的概念。
A review of the literature indicates a plethora of studies examining the coverage of Middle Eastern conflicts, but hardly any research has been explicitly framed as being developed from a peace/war journalism perspective. The current study, therefore, represents a substantive effort to remedy this deficiency. It examines the extent to which the 2010 Mavi Marmara incident is framed based on Johan Galtung’s classification of peace/war journalism. A content analysis of 156 online stories from Haaretz, The Guardian, and The New York Times suggests that overall differences exist among the war/peace narratives published in the three newspapers. The validity of few peace indicators used also was noted. The authors strongly advocate for the need to redefine indicators for peace journalism to reflect the concept as distinct from objective, and factual reporting.