Mixed initiative argument in public deliberation
Mixed initiative argument in public deliberation
复制标题
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2010
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Mark Snaith;John Lawrence;C. Reed
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Mark Snaith;John Lawrence;C. Reed
本文旨在展示论证结构（例如由论证映射工具创建和操纵的论证结构）与论证对话（例如构成在线审议过程一部分的论证对话）之间的联系。我们的方法是利用基于论证的知识表示的最新进展，并将这些与我们开发的支持论证映射活动（特别是 OVA 分析工具）和论证对话（特别是建立在 Google Wave 之上的 Arvina 对话系统）的工具联系起来。我们以苏格兰政治中最近一场有争议的辩论为研究领域，其中涉及广泛的审议方面和政治上复杂的决策。通过明确地表示论点结构，我们展示了在线辩论工具如何支持混合主动论点，其中软件自主支持的观点与人类参与者提出的观点之间存在公平的竞争环境。
This paper aims to demonstrate the connection between argument structures, such as those that are created and manipulated by argument mapping tools, and argumentative dialogues, such as those that form a part of online deliberative processes. Our approach is to use recent advances in argument-based knowledge representation, and to tie these to tools we have developed that support argument mapping activities (specifically, the OVA analysis tool), and argument dialogue (specifically, the Arvina dialogue system, which is built on top of Google Wave). We use as our domain a recent contentious debate in Scottish politics which involved both wide-scale deliberative aspects and politically complex decision making. By explicitly representing argument structure we demonstrate how online debate tools can support mixed initiative argument, in which there is a level playing field between the points of view espoused autonomously by software, and those put forward by human participants.