Balance Error Scoring System Performance Changes After a Competitive Athletic Season
Balance Error Scoring System Performance Changes After a Competitive Athletic Season
复制标题
DOI：
10.1097/jsm.0b013e318285633f
复制
发表时间：
2013-07-01
影响因子：
2.7
通讯作者：
Buckley, Thomas A.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Burk, John M.;Munkasy, Barry A.;Buckley, Thomas A.
目的：评估运动赛季后平衡误差评分系统（BESS）表现的变化。设计：一项前瞻性纵向小组研究。地点：大学生物力学研究实验室。参与者：共有 58 名大学年龄女性（23 名足球学生运动员、16 名排球学生运动员和 19 名休闲活跃的健康大学生）参与了这项研究。干预：BESS 测试进行 2 次，间隔 90 天。对于学生运动员，第一次测试（PRE）在运动赛季开始前进行，第二次测试（POST）在赛季结束后立即进行。对于休闲活跃的大学生，PRE 测试在学期开始时进行，POST 测试在学期开始后 90 天进行。 主要结果指标：将 PRE 和 POST 的 BESS 总分与 3 x 2 重复测量方差分析进行比较。还计算了总体变化分数和绝对值变化分数，并与 1 样本 t 检验进行比较，以达到零误差的预期变化。 结果：不存在按时间分组的交互作用；然而，时间有一个主要影响。 PRE（9.00 +/- 2.97 错误）和 POST（7.92 +/- 2.78 错误）BESS 性能之间存在显着改善（P = 0.003）。总体变化评分（1.08 错误）和绝对值变化评分（2.00 错误）均存在显着差异。结论：在为期 90 天的校际运动赛季后，发现 BESS 表现存在临床和统计学显着差异。
Objective: To evaluate the change in Balance Error Scoring System (BESS) performance after an athletic season.Design: A prospective longitudinal group study.Setting: University biomechanics research laboratory.Participants: A total of 58 college-aged females (23 soccer student-athletes, 16 volleyball student-athletes, and 19 recreationally active healthy college students) participated in the study.Interventions: The BESS test was administered on 2 occasions 90 days apart. For the student-athletes, the first test (PRE) was administered before the start of their athletic season and the second test (POST) was administered immediately after the season. For the recreationally active college students, the PRE test was at the beginning of the academic semester and the POST test exactly 90 days thereafter.Main Outcome Measures: Total BESS score at PRE and POST was compared with a 3 x 2 repeated measures analysis of variance. The overall change score and absolute value change score were also calculated and compared with a 1-sample t test to an expected change of zero errors.Results: There was no group by time interaction; however, there was a main effect for time. There was a significant improvement (P = 0.003) between PRE (9.00 +/- 2.97 errors) and POST (7.92 +/- 2.78 errors) BESS performance. There were significant differences for both the overall change score (1.08 errors) and the absolute value change score (2.00 errors).Conclusions: A clinically and statistically significant difference in BESS performance was identified after a 90-day intercollegiate athletic season.