Speech-Language Pathologists' Ratings of Speech Accuracy in Children With Speech Sound Disorders.
Speech-Language Pathologists' Ratings of Speech Accuracy in Children With Speech Sound Disorders.
复制标题
言语病理学家对患有言语障碍的儿童的言语准确性的评级。
DOI：
10.1044/2021_ajslp-20-00381
复制
发表时间：
2022
影响因子：
2.6
通讯作者：
Grigos,MariaI
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Jing,Linye;Grigos,MariaI
研究目的：对有语音障碍的儿童进行准确和一致的言语判断是一项挑战，因为他们会产生大量不同类型的错误模式。等级量表提供了一种系统的方法来评估整个单词，而不是单个声音。因此，这些量表可以是一种有效的方式，为语音语言病理学家（SLP）监测治疗进展。本研究以一个大的SLP群体为评价者，对现有的3点评价量表进行评价者间信度的评价。方法利用在线平台，对30名SLP进行简短的训练，然后对典型言语模式儿童和言语声音障碍儿童的单个单词进行评价。词汇在量表的三个评级类别中非常平衡。评价者间的可靠性的SLP评级的共识judgment.ResultsThe大多数的SLP（87%）达到实质性的评价者间的可靠性的共识判断使用3点评级量表。正确的产品有最高的评分者间的可靠性。生产广泛的错误有较高的协议比那些轻微的错误。某些错误类型，如元音失真，是特别具有挑战性的SLP判断。ConclusionsThis study demonstrated substantial interrater reliability to a consensus judgment among a greater most of 30 SLP using a 3-point rating.临床意义的研究结果进行了讨论沿着提出修改的培训程序，以指导未来的研究。
PurposeForming accurate and consistent speech judgments can be challenging when working with children with speech sound disorders who produce a large number and varied types of error patterns. Rating scales offer a systematic approach to assessing the whole word rather than individual sounds. Thus, these scales can be an efficient way for speech-language pathologists (SLPs) to monitor treatment progress. This study evaluated the interrater reliability of an existing 3-point rating scale using a large group of SLPs as raters.MethodUtilizing an online platform, 30 SLPs completed a brief training and then rated single words produced by children with typical speech patterns and children with speech sound disorders. Words were closely balanced across the three rating categories of the scale. The interrater reliability of the SLPs ratings to a consensus judgment was examined.ResultsThe majority of SLPs (87%) reached substantial interrater reliability to a consensus judgment using the 3-point rating scale. Correct productions had the highest interrater reliability. Productions with extensive errors had higher agreement than those with minor errors. Certain error types, such as vowel distortions, were especially challenging for SLPs to judge.ConclusionsThis study demonstrated substantial interrater reliability to a consensus judgment among a large majority of 30 SLPs using a 3-point rating. The clinical implications of the findings are discussed along with proposed modifications to the training procedure to guide future research.