Morphine‐augmented hepatobiliary scintigraphy: A meta‐analysis
Morphine‐augmented hepatobiliary scintigraphy: A meta‐analysis
复制标题
吗啡增强肝胆闪烁扫描：荟萃分析
DOI：
10.1097/00006231-199512000-00013
复制
发表时间：
1995
影响因子：
1.5
通讯作者：
Sankey V. Williams
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
M. Cabana;A. Alavi;J. Berlin;Judy A. Shea;Judy A. Shea;C. Kim;Sankey V. Williams;Sankey V. Williams
摘要本研究的目的是比较吗啡增强肝胆闪烁扫描（MA-HBS）与传统肝胆闪烁扫描（C-HBS）对急性胆囊炎的敏感性和特异性。大多数 MA-HBS 研究的结果无法与 C-HBS 估计值进行比较，因为描述 C-HBS 的文章通常包括非 MA-HBS 候选者。然而，使用荟萃分析技术结合合格研究的数据（C-HBS 4 项，MA-HBS 5 项），MA-HBS 的特异性（0.84；95% CI = 0.75–0.94）显着高于（P = 0.008）C-HBS（0.68；95% CI = 0.61–0.75）；敏感性没有差异（MA-HBS：0.96，95% CI = 0.92-0.99；C-HBS：0.97，95% CI = 0.97-0.99）。
SummaryThe aim of this study was to compare the sensitivity and specificity of morphine-augmented hepatobiliary scintigraphy (MA-HBS) with that of conventional hepatobiliary scintigraphy (C-HBS) for acute cholecystitis. The results of most MA-HBS studies cannot be compared with C-HBS estimates, since articles describing C-HBS often include non-candidates for MA-HBS. However, using meta-analytic techniques to combine data from eligible studies (4 for C-HBS and 5 for MA-HBS), the specificity of MA-HBS (0.84; 95% CI = 0.75–0.94) was significantly greater (P = 0.008) than that of C-HBS (0.68; 95% CI = 0.61–0.75); there were no differences in sensitivity (MA-HBS: 0.96, 95% CI = 0.92–0.99; C-HBS: 0.97, 95% CI = 0.97–0.99).