Organolanthanide and organoyttrium enolate chemistry. Synthesis of [(C5H4R)2Ln(.mu.-OCH:CH2)]2 complexes and the molecular structure of [(CH3C5H4)2Y(.mu.-OCH:CH2)]2
Organolanthanide and organoyttrium enolate chemistry. Synthesis of [(C5H4R)2Ln(.mu.-OCH:CH2)]2 complexes and the molecular structure of [(CH3C5H4)2Y(.mu.-OCH:CH2)]2
复制标题
DOI:
10.1021/om00138a002
复制
发表时间:
1986-07
期刊:
影响因子:
2.8
通讯作者:
W. Evans;Raul. Dominguez;T. Hanusa
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
W. Evans;Raul. Dominguez;T. Hanusa
Discussion As discussed in the Introduction, neither simple elec-trostatic considerations, nor molecular orbital calcula-tions, 17 nor steric effects predict the bent structure observed for metallocenes (CBMeB) 2Sm and (C6Me5) 2Eu. From all of these viewpoints, a parallel ring structure like that found in (CsMe5) 2Fe might be expected. 46 The sim-ilarity of the structures of (C5Me5) 2Sm and (C5Me6) 2Eu indicates that the bent structure cannot be explained on the basis of the specific 4f® or 4f7 electron configuration. The relative 4f electron configurations in these molecules evidently exert no structurally discernible effect. Such a result is consistent with previous observations that the f electron configuration has a minimal effect on the structure of organolanthanide complexes. 13It is conceivable that the bent structures of (C6Me5) 2Sm and (C5Me5) 2Eu result from intermolecular interactions and crystal packing effects. Certainly, some intermolecular distances exist in the crystal which are shorter than nor-mal. The Ln-C (ll)'distance, the shortest of the inter-molecular metal carbon contacts, would be the most likely candidate for an interaction with structural consequences. It is curious that this “interaction”, if it exists, occurs from the side of the bent structure rather than from the more sterically accessible front end. It is not clear, why such an “interaction” could not occur in a parallel ring structure in which unfavorable intramolecular methyl-methyl con-tacts would be diminished. In addition, the length of the