EU citizenship and social solidarity
EU citizenship and social solidarity
复制标题
欧盟公民身份和社会团结
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2017
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
P. Minderhoud
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
S. Mantu;P. Minderhoud
在本文中，我们试图将欧盟法院最近关于不参与经济活动的欧盟公民社会权利的判例法置于过去几年的更大政治背景中，其特点是对支撑欧盟公民身份的流动性类型的争议不断增加。欧盟公民身份与社会团结之间的关系（以流动欧盟公民的社会权利的形式）在英国脱欧事件中占据了中心舞台。关于（贫困）欧盟公民自由流动的政治辩论主要集中在滥用自由流动权利和福利旅游问题上，尽管缺乏证据表明这两者实际上在欧盟内部大规模发生。现已失效的脱欧协议凸显了最初关注经济上不活跃的欧盟公民的辩论已扩展到欧盟工人，后者的流动性被认为是欧盟一体化的积极方面。由于司法和政治干预对欧盟公民身份的社会层面提出质疑，欧盟的社会团结范围被降级，这可能会对欧盟境内的其他移民群体产生影响。
In this article, we seek to place the CJEU’s recent case law on social rights for economically inactive EU citizens within the larger political context of the last couple of years that has been characterized by the increased contestation of the type of mobility underpinning EU citizenship. The relationship between EU citizenship and social solidarity – in the form of social rights for mobile EU citizens – has taken centre stage during the Brexit affair. Political debates concerning the free movement of (poor) EU citizens have focused upon the issues of the abuse of free movement rights and welfare tourism, despite a lack of evidence that the two are actually taking place on a large scale within the EU. The now defunct Brexit deal highlights the extension of debates that initially focused on economically inactive EU citizens to EU workers, whose mobility had been considered a positive aspect of EU integration. The scope of social solidarity in the EU is demoted as a result of judicial and political interventions that question the social dimension of EU citizenship and which may have implications for other groups of migrants situated within the EU.