A snapshot of creativity: Evaluating a quick and simple method for assessing divergent thinking
A snapshot of creativity: Evaluating a quick and simple method for assessing divergent thinking
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.tsc.2009.06.005
复制
发表时间：
2009-01-01
影响因子：
3.7
通讯作者：
Nusbaum, Emily C.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Silvia, Paul J.;Martin, Christopher;Nusbaum, Emily C.
创造力评估通常使用开放式发散思维任务。然而，这些任务的典型评分方法（独特性评分和主观评分）是时间密集型的，因此研究人员将发散思维作为辅助结构是不切实际的。本研究评估了发散思维任务的快照评分，其中一组反应得到一个单一的整体评级。我们比较了快照评分和前两名评分，这是一种耗时的详细评分方法。样本的大学生（n = 226）完成了发散性思维的任务和个性和艺术专业知识的措施。前两个评分的效应量较大，但快照评分总体表现良好。因此，快照评分似乎是一种快速而简单的评估创造力的方法。(C)2009爱思唯尔有限公司版权所有。
Creativity assessment commonly uses open-ended divergent thinking tasks. The typical methods for scoring these tasks (uniqueness scoring and subjective ratings) are time-intensive, however, so it is impractical for researchers to include divergent thinking as an ancillary construct. The present research evaluated snapshot scoring of divergent thinking tasks, in which the set of responses receives a single holistic rating. We compared snapshot scoring to top-two scoring, a time-intensive, detailed scoring method. A sample of college students (n = 226) completed divergent thinking tasks and measures of personality and art expertise. Top-two scoring had larger effect sizes, but snapshot scoring performed well overall. Snapshot scoring thus appears promising as a quick and simple approach to assessing creativity. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.