Type & layout: how typography and design can get your message across - or get in the way
Type & layout: how typography and design can get your message across - or get in the way
复制标题
类型
DOI：
10.1075/idj.9.1.18lun
复制
发表时间：
1998
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Ole Lund
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Ole Lund
英国医学委员会[原文如此]在 1926 年整理的研究中声称，无衬线字体中没有衬线会导致委员会所说的辐射，这是一种光学效应，字体行之间的空间侵入字母，形成一种光振动形式，不利于舒适的阅读。研究称衬线可以防止这种照射；因此衬线类型更容易阅读。(1984, p. 18)为了秩序：不是医学研究委员会或派克“断言”或“说”了关于衬线和辐射的问题。派克在他对易读性研究进行的非常全面的回顾中所做的只是以一种有义务和非批准的方式纳入了六篇论文的报道，其中作者在非实验的基础上通过认为衬线有助于防止有害辐射来归因于他们对衬线字体的偏好（见 Pyke 1926，第 21, 76, 99-101 页）。
In research collated by the British Medical Council [sic] in 1926, it was asserted that the absence of serifs in sans serif body type permitted what the council referred to as irradiation, an optical effect in which space between lines of type intruded into the letters, setting up a form of light vibration, which militated against comfortable reading. Serifs the research said, prevented this irradiation; thus serif types were easier to read.(1984, p. 18)For the sake of order: it was not the Medical Research Council or Pyke who'asserted'or'said'this about serifs and irradiation. What Pyke did, in his very comprehensive review of legibility studies, was simply to include, in a duty-bound and non-approving manner, coverage of six papers where the authors on a nonexperimental basis ascribed their preference for seriffed typefaces by arguing that serifs helped to prevent harmful irradiation (see Pyke 1926, pp. 21, 76, 99-101).